Homosexuality

An Open Letter to Beth Moore

We have answered some of the most commonly asked
questions about the Open Letter to Beth Moore here.

If you are unfamiliar with the events surrounding this letter, please read
An Open Letter to Beth Moore – Timeline of Events.

Dear Mrs. Moore,

Hello โ€“ we hope this finds you doing well.

We as female Bible teachers ourselves write this letter to you in hopes of receiving clarification of your views on an important issue: homosexuality.

In the last few years, particularly since 2016, you have been very vocal in your opposition to misogyny and racism. Anytime a story with so much of a whiff of these issues comes to the forefront you are very quick to speak out. The actions of the Covington kids, for example, you said โ€œis so utterly antichrist it reeks of the vomit of hellโ€ in a January 19, 2019 tweet; a tweet you deleted, without apology to the kids, once the full video was shown that portrayed a very different reality than what initial reporting suggested.

It is this Johnny-on-the-spot readiness to engage issues related to misogyny and racism that makes your virtual silence on the issue of homosexuality so puzzling.

To your credit, in your book To Live is Christ: The Life and Ministry of Paul, you wrote, โ€œI met a young man who had experienced freedom from the bondage of homosexualityโ€ (pg. 119). This book was first published in 1997 and then republished in 2008 but it seems since then you have said very little if anything publicly about this issue.

Another factor prompting our open letter to you is the very public mutual affection and admiration between you, Jen Hatmaker and Jonathan Merritt.

Jen Hatmaker and you regularly exchange affirming posts of one another on social media. In just one recent example, Hatmaker on September 17, 2018 wrote โ€œBeth Moore will enjoy my respect and devotion forever. She is worthy of being a mentor to an entire generation. And friends, I wish you knew how deeply and profoundly she has loved me these last two yearsโ€ (Source). In an interview two years before this post, October of 2016, Jen Hatmaker said she was a โ€œleft-leaning moderate,โ€ came out as fully supportive of homosexual marriage (saying it can be โ€œholyโ€) and said practicing homosexuals can be part of the regenerate body of Christ (Source). It was then that LifeWay decided to pull all of her books from its shelves.

More recently, on April 9, 2019, Jonathan Merritt tweeted, โ€œI no longer believe @BethMooreLPM is a human. I think she is an angelic being having a human experience.โ€ (Source). Jonathan Merritt has admitted to having at least one homosexual encounter about a decade ago (Source). Today, by his own admission he rejects biblical inerrancy, says a โ€œliberal Protestantโ€ would be an accurate description of him, and says his sexual orientation he no longer views as โ€œbrokenโ€ (Source). In a crass response to Dr. Owen Strachan tweeting, rightly so, that there should never be an occasion in which men โ€œcuddleโ€ with one another, Merritt on May 1, 2019 tweeted in response, โ€œCโ€™mon, Owen. You can be my little spoonโ€ (Source). Merritt also openly affirms that โ€œqueerโ€ and LGBTQ people are included in Godโ€™s Kingdom and it is a โ€œcarrot of false promisesโ€ that the Gospel can make such people straight (Source, Source). He supports โ€œDrag Queen Story Timeโ€ in which drag queens read stories to young children in public libraries (Source 27:40 mark). He even appears to doubt the exclusivity of Christ (Source).

Both Jen Hatmaker and Jonathan Merritt are known for their belief that practicing homosexuals can be Christians. Given that this is such a deeply held conviction that both share and this conviction (wrong though it is) has cost them both in their standing amongst theologically conservative evangelicals, and that they both praise you so highly, it raises the natural question as to where you stand on this issue.

Given his beliefs, Merritt publicly saying that he believes you to be โ€œan angelic being having a human experienceโ€ strongly suggests that his high praise of you is, at least partially, rooted in your views on this issue that you have shared with him privately. It seems most unlikely that he would be praising you so highly if you had told him that as a homosexual man he will perish for all of eternity unless he repents. It likewise seems unlikely that Hatmaker (a married, straight woman) would praise you so highly if you told her that her affirmation of homosexuality and homosexual marriage is sinful and that she must repent.

When all of this is coupled with your total silence on homosexuality (in stark contrast to your very vocal stance on gender/racial/abuse issues) it naturally raises the question as to what your beliefs on it truly are.

With these factors in mind, and knowing that millions of people follow your teachings, we would like to ask you:

1. Do you believe homosexuality is inherently sinful?

2. Do you believe that the practice of the homosexual lifestyle is compatible with holy Christian living?

3. Do you believe a person who dies as a practicing homosexual but professes to be a Christian will inherit eternal life?

4. Do you believe same sex attraction is, in and of itself, an inherently sinful, unnatural, and disordered desire that must be mortified?

5. Why have you been so silent on this subject in light of your desire to โ€œteach the word of God?โ€

We ask these questions to you out of genuine concern. As Bible teachers, all of us are held to a very high standard and will give an account for how we handle Godโ€™s word. As you know, homosexuality is widely discussed and debated amongst evangelicals and society at large.

Many families are affected by this issue. The most loving thing obedient Christians can do for them is to clearly communicate Godโ€™s truth. We look forward to your clarification on these pressing issues. Thank you.

Kind regards,

Susan Heck
With the Master

Debbie Lynne Kespert
The Outspoken Tulip

Michelle Lesley
Michelle Lesley- Discipleship for Christian Women
A Word Fitly Spoken Podcast

Martha Peace
Martha Peace

Elizabeth Prata
The End Time

Amy Spreeman
Berean Research
Naomi’s Table
A Word Fitly Spoken Podcast


Readers, if you would like to add your signature to this open letter, please comment below. (My regular comment parameters still apply.
Please read before commenting.)
Supportive comments will be considered signatures.

1.  Debbie Gartland    2. Sherri Brazeal     3. Theresa Miller    4. Cheryl Thompson

5. Jamie Gladden     6. MrsHLBjr     7. Sue Layman     8. Dottie Gephart

9. Laura Moses     10. Cynthia Sutton     11. Kristy Kapp     12. Andrea Crawford

13. Gina     14. Kimberly     15. Sarah Deringer     16. Laura Esther

17.  Julie Waschuk   18. Britt Smith     19. Sybil Hemingway     20. Alma Moss

21. Nancy Brown     22. McKenzie Pope Moffett     23. Barbara Phillips

24. Anna Wood     25. Tami Recke     26. Amy Mabe     27. Jacy Harrison

28. Deena647     29. Kara Peters     30. Steph Johnson

31. Cristy Ann Bestwick    32. Jessica Laird     33. Lydia Hamre

34. Pat Seitz     35. Cindy Duncan-Shaw     36. Cathy Wentzel

37. Linda Rios     38. Kelley Andrich     39. Kelly Jo     40. Katie Smith

41. Amanda Ridenour     42. Melissa Leigh Morris     43. Erika Morris

44. Pam     45. Ann Blaskovich     46. Molly Hoverson     47. Linda Culp Collier

48. Heather Brownlie McCuaig     49. Ginger Weincek     50. Shelley Brown

51. Lauren Hereford     52. Miyoshig     53. Jeri Lowe-Howell     54. Angela

55. Kelly Cason     56. Kris Turrentine     57. Lisa Carey     58. Darlene Doss

60. Annie Monserrate     61. Cheryl R Lamz     62. Maribel C Ibrahim

63. sgoetz78     64. Caitlin Wickliffe     65. Regina Hagan     66. Anne R.

67. Julie Harrod     68. Katie Jay     69. Dawn Staton     70. Susan

71. Jennifer Buck     72. Amy Andrews     73. Stephanie Madrigal     74. triplejaymom

75. Cindy LaFreniere     76. Sharon Cole     77. Julie Fugate     78. Kathy Peters

79. Mrs. Lisor     80. Robin Sykee     81. Lisa King     82. Susan     83. Lisa Brown

84. Eileen Smith     85. Karen McMahon     86. Cathy Kaech     87. Carie Stephens

88. Kim Chapman     89. Cheryl Toepfer     90. Nancy Madrick     91. Linda Sullivan

92. Brittany Hunt    93. Anne Mai     94. Maureen Kopper     95. Julie Norton

96. Debbie Fleig     97. Hilary Osborne     98. Maggie Hebert     99. Leigh Melniszyn

100. Erin Coughlin     101. Laurel Pinske     102. Alicia Bowman     103. Jori Groen

104. Laura Gutwein     105. Nicole B. Guillory     106. Lisa Mifflin

107. Kristine Stone     108.  Carol Anne    109. Rachel Lipski     110. Laura Smith

111. jacor13     112. Traci Danker     113. Christina Pountney

114. Elizabeth Jackson     115. Marita Tibbetts     116. Amy Ramey

117. Maygen Wilson     118. Mary Bradley-Carlson     119. Allison Smith

120. Sandra     121. Courtney Sharp     122. Barb Prihoda     123. Penny Humphreys

124. Jan Bennett     125. Ren Moody     126. Trish Hisle     127. Heidi Moody

128. Carey Hurlburt     129. Kate Skogstad     130. Suzanne Lukawski

131. Elizabeth Beales     132. Susan Tesauro     133. Carol Koprowski

134. Christine Pack     135. Susan Stribich     136. Becka Goings

137. Pamela Thomas     138. Deborah Hunter     139. Mo Weaver

140. Kim Roberts     141. Corrie Dove     142. Lauren Holladay

143. Patty Roberts     144. Beth Stark     145. Sarah Crow     146. Sofia Shapleigh

147. Carnata Horton     148. Dulce Rodejo     149. Heather Fernandez

150. Carolyn Sevier     151. Christine Dullea     152. Amanda Gardiner

153. Char Hartman     154. Susan Haymon     155. Audra Huntet     156. Karla Nunez

157. Debra Pendergraft     158. Debbie     159. Leah P.     160. Sissel Salayda

161. Stephanie Yearwood     162. Melissa Harrison     163. tamtam0101

164. Anita Meisen     165. Elizabeth Moyle     166. Karen Gregory

167. Kate Thompson     168. Shannon Choate     169. Carol Berubee

170. Michele Harden     171. Lisa Snyder     172. Camille Warren

173. Diane Wenning     174. Nancy Nuzzolo     175. Kylee Chavers

176. Lynda Foster     177. Patricia Sanford     178. Jessica Lam

179. Brooke Anglin     180. Heidi Pearce     181. Michele Archambault

182. Michele Lewis    183. Pat Guldenpfennig     184. Angela Asano

185. Sue Cryderman     186. Jacqueline Cody     187. Theresia Smith

188. Peggy Summers     189. Lora M Carver     190. Regina Bean

191. Camille Patterson     192. Kate Butler     193. Leisa Minear

194. Ellie Mae Stankus     195. Tina Nix     196. Linda Currans

197. Daniela Ledwick     198. Melissa Flowers     199. flippingtheswitch

200. Vicky Jackson     201. Cherice Graham     202. Lora Burdette

203. Linda Hughes     204. Heather Ells     205. Jessica Harris

206. Kim von olhausen     207. Cynthia Garcia     208. Norleen Gardner Cheser

209. C. G. Jackson     210. Liz Avrit     211. Charlotte Irons Augustine

212. Tammera Scrivner     213. Donna Nelson     214. Susan Johnson

215. Qiana S. Shaw     216. Donna Dabbs     217. deuteronomysix5to9

218. Tiet Parsons     219. Marline Coronado     220. Julie Wyatt     221. Shelly Howard

222. Janice Porter Huertas     223. Lea K. Housley     224. Bonnie Secrest

225. Julie McKenzie     226. Terri Weiford     227. Pamela Melland

228. Diane E Ellison     229. Cherice Graham     230. Becky U

231. ruthsreminiscings     232. Darlene Tan     233. Kim Starling     234. Candy Macy

235. Rebecca Walls     236. Amy Scott     237. lynettestalls4146

238. Jammie Burwell     239. psfair     240. Laura Flack     241. Kayleigh H.

242. Cel Sherer     243. Kristy Jackson    244. Autumn Lisor     245. Julie Matteson

246. Keri Drescher     247. Name later removed for online anonymity     248. Hayley Wiley     249. Grace Pimm

250. Melanie Carrel     251. Lora Schmitz     252. Julie Wood     253. lauranlou

254. Pamela Collier     255. Coleen Thomas     256. Linda Hughes     257. Becky Bizzell

258. Debbie Lund     259. Connie Gilliam     260. Brandy Hurley

261. Linda Sola Gratia     262. Emily Kelly     263. Gracia     264. Sandie Fields

265. Erika Luft     266. Jennifer Sanders     267. Esther Wood     268. Trina Armstrong

269. tburks0123     270. Cathy Stein     271. Angela Fletcher     272. bjhcfr

273. Abby Adams     274. Diana     275. Cindy Price     276. Karen Buttle

277. Beth Seifert     278. Gemma Gregory     279. Julie Six     280. Colleen Ridge

281. Brenda Klockenga     282. Mary Bausano     283. Heather Thompson

284. Deana Klarich     285. Cheri Briere      286. Frankie Peterson

287. Charlotte Warren     288. Daphne Self     289. Billie J Freeman     290. Tara Hiley

291. Lou Ann Platt     292. I. N. Carpenter     293. Rachel Capps     294. Emily Tucker

295. Elena C. Parr     296. Julie Martin     297. lex122083     298. RM Vicary

299. Tania Carr     300. Sonia Correa     301. Wanda Poudrette     302. Lisa Israel

303. Kelly Gilmore     304. Melissa Ice     305. Michele Smith    306. Natalie Zeiler

307. Sonia Shoultz     308. MJ     309. Kandi Veazey     310. Haley Phillips

311. Kim Francia     312. Janexsy Zayas     313. Debra Hausmann

314. Patricia Finch     315. Bethany     316. Ashley Wyly     317. Amanda Smith

318. Wendy Robinson     319. Lara Roberts     320. Robin Hayes

321. Maggie Pearson     322. Slone Chapman     323. Dawn Antczak

324. Loretta Pardo     325. Autumn Beck     326. Casey Hylton

327. Sonya McGowan     328. Elaine Harman     329. Melissa Googe

330. Leisa Minear     331. Starr Bowlin     332. Jamie Niederkohr

333. Andrea Thomas     334. Tennille Betker     335. Debbie Nateghi

336. Cindy Price     337. Linda Brown     338. Rhonda Gomez     339. Liz James

340. Laura Burton     341. Jamie Dollinger     342. Christie Ann Algeo

343. Kerri Wagner     344. Amy Wood     345. Amy Hall     346. Beth Malarkey

347. Jo Vazquez     348. Cindy Mock     349. Christine Combs     350. Catherine- BBF

351. Kim- BBF     352. Vicki- BBF    353. Tina- BBF     354. Tara- BBF

355. Cate- BBF     356. Patti- BBF     356. Anonymous- BBF     357. Pamela Couvrette

358. Doris Sparks     359. Deborah Hallman     360. Cyndy Adeniyi

361. Laurie Ingram     362. Susan     363. Kay Cude     364. Melanie Lockhart

365. Leah Johnson     366. Jeni Myers     367. Keri Stankova     368. Tanya Herring

369. B Logue     370. Charlotte Sutton     371. ameliavk     372. Jannelle Kodad

373. Debbie Nateghi     374. Lynette     375. Heaven Henderson     376. Jennifer Rice

377. Michelle David     378. Karen Butterfield     379. Sheila H. Bragg

380. Angela Wismer     381. Karen Short     382. Pamela Ellenburg

383. Danielle Ware     384. Emily George     385. April Chapman     386. Gayle Smith

387. Liz Maria     388. Kris Schlagel     389. Amanda Simkins     390. Julie Garber

391. Hope Green     392. Nicole Mitchell     393. Rachelle Journey

394. Chrissy Reimer     395. Margaret Gunden     396. Maureen Payne

397. Rebecca Barner     398. Melissa Armstrong     399. Holly Major     400. Lisa PS

401. Linda Rice     402. Nancy Carrera     403. Katy Alderton     404. Christine Frost

405. Renee J. Bailey     406. Amberly Wieler     407. Susan K     408. Katie Purvis

409. Valerie Ward     410. Alise Grant     411. mvfreeman     412. Jo Rodgers

413.  Mitzi Turpin     414. Tina Liouzis     415. Marsha West     416. Christine Parfitt

417. Leslie J. Witty     418. Victoria Nelson     419. Leah Stewart

420. Nancy Carrera     421. Lydia Harris     422. karolewithak     423. Diane Conklin

424. Tammy Monson     425. Katie Quintana     426. Diane Kelley     427. Carole Kaetz

428. Jessica Oathoudt     429. Valerie Muirhead     430. Lisa Schmidt

431. Kim Schwart     432. Raynie Sivillo     433. Lisa Ente     434. Tina Dewey

435. Amy. Rozycki     436. Jennifer Christensen     437. Christa Reynolds

439. Kathy Freeman     440. Traci Gardner     441. Debbie Landers     442. caligurrl61

443. Melissa McIntyre     444. Kim     445. Valerie Hupp     446. Sharon Buss

447. Kira Ulmer     448. Brittany Bieghler     449. Nicole Bibelheimer McAbee

450. Sandy Bitter     451. Monica Turner     452. Elizabeth Emerson

453. Kara Emerson     454. Janice Krieger     455. Peggy M. Miller

456. Cecelia Matchett     457. Wendi Peterson     458. LeDawn Kosek

459. Dianne Larios     460. Rhonda Owens     461. Kathleen Lanteigne

462. Terra Hicks     463. Brenda Block     464. Lisa Ente     465. Sarah Elizabeth

466. Darlene Diaz     467. Debra Wiest     468. Lyndsey Fromme     469. Laurie Tietjen

470. Connie Windham     471. Gladys Martรญnez     472. Beth Cavete     473. Linda Bell

474. Beth Finkbeiner     475. Heather Rollins     476. Charla Counts Tatom

477. Ose Burnett     478. Kathy Firth     479. Debbie Bergt     480. J Chen

481. Melissa Duerksen     482. Kate Hendrickson     483. Miranda Abugharbeya

484. Gisele Krippner     485. Robin Kelley     486. Kari     487. Maggie Gunden

488. Mollie Moore     489. Diana Johnson     490. Stacy Brooks     491. Gina Shaw

492. Kellie Watson     493. Bonnie Schwartz    494. Kay Davis     495. Lisa

496. Rosilind Jukic    497. Laura Kelly     498. Sandy Artus     499. Clare McNaul

500. Tami     501. Diane Ostrow     502. Amanda Ladefoged     503. Bev Azure

504. Hayley Bevier     505. Mary L. Briere     506. Rommy Miller     507. Tammy Derryberry

508. Billie Freeman     509. Amy Knight

Encouragement, Pop Theology

God created you to do amazing things?

A while back, I saw this meme posted by a woman who is in a significant position of leadership in a Christian organization.

Ladies – especially those of us who lead, teach, and minister to women – we ought not be posting or teaching things like this.

First of all, it’s misleading. This is not what Ephesians 2:10 says. Ephesians 2:10 says:

For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.

Someone has taken it upon herself to summarize the verse in her own words and created a meme which makes it look like Ephesians 2:10 is being quoted. And her summary is incorrect – a mishandling of God’s Word.

Which brings me to point number two. This is not what Ephesians 2:10 means.

The “good works” God has prepared for us to walk in are seldom amazing – at least not in the way we usually define the word “amazing”.

The “good works” God has prepared for us to walk in are seldom amazing – at least not in the way we usually define the word “amazing”. Changing diapers, doing the laundry, breaking up fights between siblings, dealing with unreasonable bosses and annoying co-workers, and scrubbing toilets can all be “good works” God has ordained for us to perform to His glory, but most people wouldn’t call those things “amazing”. They’re mundane. Ordinary. Everyday life types of things.

And that’s OK!

First Thessalonians 4:10b-12 puts it like this:

But we urge you, brothers…to aspire to live quietly, and to mind your own affairs, and to work with your hands, as we instructed you, so that you may walk properly before outsiders and be dependent on no one.

God has called us to serve Him and one another, and that is usually plain, unglamorous, non-prestigious, hard work. Forget “amazing” – often, no one will notice or thank us for our good works, or if they do notice, they might criticize the job we’ve done.

Cotton candy “theology” ends up being discouraging in the long run.

Finally, cotton candy “theology” like this ends up being discouraging in the long run:

“God created me to to amazing things, huh? This morning I ironed, cleaned dog vomit off the rug, and spent an hour ferrying kids to various activities. That doesn’t feel very amazing. When does this ‘amazing’ thing kick in? How long do I have to wait?”

Or:

“I’m a single mom with a full time job and three kids. I barely make it to church every week and struggle to get six hours of sleep a night with all I have to do. I’m exhausted. And now you’re telling me I have to do something ‘amazing’ on top of that?”

Or:

“I’m just an ordinary woman. God hasn’t really given me anything ‘amazing’ to do. Maybe He doesn’t love me. Maybe I don’t have enough faith, or I’m not praying hard enough, or there’s some secret sin in my life that I’m not aware of. Maybe I’m not even saved. What a failure I am.”

Ladies, ideas like the one in this meme do more harm than good. If we want to encourage each other, we need to do it biblically – with what God’s word actually says and with what God’s word actually means – with good, sound theology.

If we want to encourage each other, we need to do it biblically – with what God’s word actually says and with what God’s word actually means – with good, sound theology.

1&2 Timothy Bible Study

1 & 2 Timothy: Lesson 8

Previous Lessons:ย 1,ย 2,ย 3,ย 4,ย 5,ย 6, 7


Last week, we finished up the book of 1 Timothy. Today, we’re doing our preliminary background work on the book of 2 Timothy before diving into the text. You might want to review lesson 1 (link above) and compare the background information on 1 Timothy to the background information on 2 Timothy. How are they similar? How are they different?


Introduction to 2 Timothy

Before we begin studying a book of the Bible, itโ€™s very important that we understand some things about that book. We need to knowโ€ฆ

Whoย the author was and anything we might be able to find out about him or his background.

Whoย the audience of the book is: Jews or Gentiles? Old Testament Israelites or New Testament Christians? This will help us understand the authorโ€™s purpose and approach to what heโ€™s writing.

Whatย kind of biblical literature weโ€™re looking at. We approach books of history differently than books of wisdom, books of wisdom differently than books of prophecy, etc.

Whatย the purpose of the book is. Was it written to encourage? Rebuke? Warn?

Whatย the historical backdrop is for the book. Is Israel at war? At peace? In exile? Under a bad king? Good king? Understanding the historical events surrounding a piece of writing help us understand what was written and why it was written.

Whenย the book was written. Where does the book fall on the timeline of biblical history? This is especially important for Old Testament books which are not always arranged in chronological order.

So this week, before we start studying the actual text of the book of 2 Timothy, we need to lay the foundation to understanding the book by finding the answers to these questions.

Read the following overviews of the book of 2 Timothy, taking notes on anything that might aid your understanding of the book, and answer the questions below:

Bible Introductions: 2 Timothyย at Grace to You

Overview of the Book of 2 Timothyย at Reformed Answers

Book of 2 Timothyย at Got Questions

1. Who wrote the book of 2 Timothy? How do we know this?

2. Approximately when was 2 Timothy written? What is the geographical setting of the book of 2 Timothy? Here are some maps (scroll down to โ€œ2 Timothyโ€) that may be helpful as you study through the book of 2 Timothy.

3. Who is the original, intended audience of the book of 2 Timothy? Describe the historical setting (historic events, politics, sociology of the time, etc.) of 2 Timothy.

4. Whichย genre of biblical literature is the book of 2 Timothy: law, history, wisdom, poetry, narrative, epistles, or prophecy/apocalyptic? What does this tell us about the approach we should take when studying this book versus our approach to books of other genres?

5. What is the theme or purpose of the book of 2 Timothy?

6. What are some of the major topics of instruction in the book of 2 Timothy? How do these topics relate to the theme of 2 Timothy?

7. What are some ways 2 Timothy points to and connects to Jesus?

8. What else did you learn about 2 Timothy or the setting of this book that might help you understand the text of the book better?

Take some time in prayer this week to begin preparing your heart to study 2 Timothy. What are some ways your pastor and church could be encouraged by the instruction of 2 Timothy? What might you learn that could make you a healthier church member? Do you have any areas that need improvement when it comes to the way you serve God or your brothers and sisters in Christ? Ask God to grow you in those areas as we continue to study 1 & 2 Timothy: The Structure and Spirit of the Church.

Family, Mailbag

The Mailbag: Stay at Home Dads?

 

What is the Biblical view of men fulfilling womenโ€™s roles? I.e. staying home and managing the household, caring for small children, etc. while the woman works outside the home to provide for the family?

Super question! It’s not a cut-and-dried easy answer, though. There are a lot of things to take into consideration.

The first thing we need to consider is, of course, what the Bible says about this issue. And when we look at what the Bible says about human behavior, we need to look at two things: the heart and the actions. The Bible does forbid and command a lot of actions, but God is also clear that He judges the heart. It is possible to do the right thing with the wrong motives and the wrong thing with the right motives. We want to make sure we have right motives that lead us to do the right thing.

And Samuel said, โ€œHas the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to listen than the fat of rams. For rebellion is as the sin of divination, and presumption is as iniquity and idolatry. 1 Samuel 15:22-23a

For the Lord sees not as man sees: man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.โ€ 1 Samuel 16:7b

The first question we need to ask ourselves is, “Is there an explicit command that the husband must leave the house and go to work every day to financially support the family, a command that he absolutely cannot stay at home and manage the household and raise the children, or a command that a wife may not work outside the home or support her family financially?”

I have not found any specific, in context, “thou shalt/thou shalt not” commands along those lines. And there’s a reason for that. God beautifully designed the Bible to be applicable and relevant to all people, across all cultures, in all time periods. So there are some universal commands in the Bible that apply to everybody, everywhere, in every time. For example: It is a sin to murder whether you’re young or old, male or female, smart or dumb, ugly or pretty, rich or poor, living in the Middle East or Polynesia or Antarctica, in 3271 B.C., A.D. 0, or A.D. 2019. Murder is always a sin, no matter what.

But God has not chosen to make that same pronouncement about the financial support of the family and who should work inside or outside the home. If we examine all of the Scriptures that mention men and women working, we can see a general overall pattern that points to the wisdom, in most cases, of wives doing most of the household management and child-rearing, leaving husbands free to concentrate primarily on bringing home the bacon, but God has not chosen to make this a universal command.

(I’m sure many readers are thinking, “But what about Titus 2:5, saying women are to be ‘workers at home’?” First, this is not a command that women are never to work outside the home (keep reading for more Scripture about women working and contributing to the support of their families). Second, if you’ll examine that verse in context (2:2-10), you’ll notice that this passage deals with people’s character, not careers. This can be easier to see if you compare Titus 2:3-5 with 1 Timothy 5:3-16, especially v.6, 13-14. Women are not to be lazy, idlers, and busybodies, they are to be hard workers, glorifying God in their work. In first century culture, this nearly always meant marrying, raising children, and managing their households, because this was virtually the only culturally appropriate venue available to them in which to work. Titus 2:5 is primarily about working hard to the glory of God, not primarily about where that work is performed. Does this mean all Christian women are free to abandon their children and homes in favor of working outside the home just because they feel like it? Of course not. As we’re about to see, that goes back to having a godly motive, going with the grain of the way God generally created women if at all possible, and discerning what is pleasing to the Lord in the circumstances in which He has placed your family. Which is exactly the type of character Titus 2 and 1 Timothy 5 teach that Christian women are to have.)

Why did God not make this a command? Because in His sovereignty, over time, God has allowed or created different types of cultures to develop at the macro level, and different sorts of circumstances to occur in the lives of various individuals at the micro level.

In our culture, with regard to supporting a family, it is typical for a husband to get up Monday through Friday, leave the house, work for someone else for eight hours, receive a paycheck, and return home.

Although that was true for some families, particularly city-dwellers, during Bible times, it was far less the norm than it is today. Think about the types of work most often mentioned in the Bible. It was a much more agrarian society. Dads usually worked their land and livestock as an extension of their home, and moms and any children who were old enough had their chores around the “farm” as well. The whole family worked together to provide necessary sustenance, and dads had much more direct oversight over their children on a day to day basis than a 21st century dad who leaves home and goes to the office every day.

But even in situations in which there was a family business (such as Joseph being a carpenter) the sons usually grew up learning the business under the direct tutelage of their fathers. And though the daughters were being trained at home to learn how to be good wives, it is reasonable to assume that they and their mothers helped out with the business as needed in a culturally appropriate way.ยน There was much more integration of work and family in that culture, giving fathers more contact with their children during the day.

There are also passages in the Bible that help us to see that bringing in income was not strictly relegated to men and child-rearing was not strictly relegated to women. In Proverbs 31, we see a wife and mother conducting business and contributing to the support of her family. We see Deborah “working outside the home”. We find that Lydia was, in some way, a merchant. And we do not see the Bible condemning these women as ungodly for contributing to the support of their families or performing some kind of work outside the home. Quite the opposite, in fact – the “Proverbs 31 woman” is, to this day, held up as the ideal wife and mother for godly women to emulate.

Furthermore, we often see passages in Scripture that lay the ultimate responsibility for instructing, disciplining, and properly bringing up children at Dad’s feet, not Mom’s. Read the first nine chapters of Proverbs. This is a father, not a mother, training up his son. And take a look at Ephesians 6:4 (Fathers…bring [your children] up) and Colossians 3:21 (Fathers, do not provoke your children…).

So there is no explicit biblical command about only husbands supporting the family financially and only wives managing the household and raising the children. We need to make sure we separate out what is biblical and what is cultural when it comes to the roles of husbands and wives.

As I mentioned, in addition to God sovereignly creating/allowing different cultures on the macro level, He has also created/allowed, on the micro level, varying life situations for various families. Dads who are disabled or have medical conditions that are more conducive to staying home with the children than having a job outside the home. Men who have had very limited educational and job opportunities who fall in love with and marry women already established in lucrative careers. And, especially in these modern times, Dads who are able to work from home while caring for the children. These and other scenarios can be contributing factors when it comes to which spouse works outside the home (If, indeed, working outside the home as someone else’s employee is necessary for either spouse; working from home or starting your own home-based business is an option many families overlook).

So there are a lot of external, and sometimes unavoidable, cultural and personal circumstances at play in each family’s decision-making process. But what about the internal factors at play? This brings us back to the motive of the heart.

What is the husband’s motive for wanting to stay home with the children? Is it because he’s lazy (lemme just take a moment to say this: if you’re lazy, raising children and managing a household isn’t the job for you) and just wants to shirk responsibility? Because he’s so arrogant or headstrong that he refuses to submit to a boss’s authority? Because he wants to live in luxury on his wife’s salary rather than cutting expenses and living more modestly on what he is able to earn so she can stay at home?

What is the wife’s motive for wanting to work outside the home while her husband manages the household and raises the children? Is she a feminist out to make a statement or further an agenda? Does she pridefully feel that the day to day job of wife and mom is beneath her? Is she finding her identity in her position, her income, or the praise of men instead of finding her identity in Christ?

These are wrong reasons for doing what might, financially, actually be the right thing. But as I said, as Christians, we need to make sure we have right motives leading us to do the right thing. And what is the right motive in this, or any other, decision-making process?

Walk as children of light (for the fruit of light is found in all that is good and right and true), and try to discern what is pleasing to the Lord. Ephesians 5:8b-9

Husbands and wives each need to repent of any wrong motives they may have harbored in their hearts, walk in Christ as children of light, sit down together, pray for God to give them wisdom, examine all the factors at play in their situation, and try to discern what is pleasing to the Lord in the situation He has sovereignly placed them in.

For most families in our culture, what this typically ends up looking like is that the husband is the main breadwinner and the wife is the main manager of the household and children. And part of the reason for this is that God has generally wired men to desire to go out and conquer the world, and He has generally wired women to desire to keep the home fires burning. So if there aren’t any circumstances that force a couple to go against that grain, it’s usually wisest for Dad to be the primary financial supporter of the family and Mom to be the primary manager of the family. But there are going to be godly exceptions to the rule, and we need to be sure we’re not assuming people are in sin just because they don’t fit what’s usually the norm.


ยนCertainly there were other types of work/employment in Bible times, I’m just using these primary two to demonstrate my point.

If you have a question about: a Bible passage, an aspect of theology, a current issue in Christianity, or how to biblically handle a family, life, or church situation, comment below (Iโ€™ll hold all questions in queue {unpublished} for a future edition ofย The Mailbag) or send me anย e-mail or private message. If your question is chosen for publication, your anonymity will be protected.

Complementarianism

Mythbusting Complementarianism: 4 Truths Egalitarians Need to Know About Complementarian Women

I am often frustrated in my role as a complementarianยน woman. I am not frustrated by what God teaches in the Bible about my roles in the home and the church. I am not frustrated in carrying out those roles. I am not frustrated by complementarian men.

I am frustrated by egalitarians – most of the ones who have crossed my path, anyway – because of the incorrect assumptions they make about me and other complementarian womenยฒ.

And it’s not just that the assumptions are wrong, it’s that the assumptions are often hypocritically, “log in the eye,” wrong. Then, they turn around and use these false assumptions as reasons to fight against complementarianism. But the reasons don’t exist. They’re shadow boxing. Fighting against a ghost. If you’re going to fight for something, your fight should at least be based on legitimate reasons.

I’m under no delusions that this article will change the hearts and minds of egalitarians, but if I could, here’s what I’d try to help them understand…

1.
It’s a spiritual issue.

I know this isn’t going to be popular. I know I’m going to be called judgmental and harsh and any number of other printable and unprintable names, but I’m going to say this anyway because this is the crucial element on which this entire complementarian vs. egalitarian argument rests.

This is a spiritual issue. It’s not an oppressors versus victims issue, it’s not about power or position or circumstances or legalism or casting off shackles. It’s not about any of those visible, tangible, surface level things we think it’s about. This goes beyond the earthly realm and has its foundation in the invisible, spiritual realm. The reason you hold the positions and opinions you hold as an individual is based on one thing – your relationship with God. This is a me versus God issue. Do you love and obey God as a genuinely regenerated Christian, or do you reject Him and rebel against His commands as someone who is still lost?

The Bible makes crystal clear from Genesis to Revelation that people who genuinely know and love God obey Him, and that if you don’t obey Him, you don’t know Him or love Him. Over and over and over again we see this through Israel’s countless cycles of idolatry and the prophets calling them to repentance in the Old Testament, to John’s near broken-record repetition of the theme in the New Testament. Scripture is clear. Love of God and obedience to God are inextricably and irreducibly intertwined.

And by this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments. Whoever says โ€œI know himโ€ but does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him, but whoever keeps his word, in him truly the love of God is perfected. By this we may know that we are in him: whoever says he abides in him ought to walk in the same way in which he walked. 1 John 2:3-6

Additionally, if you’re not saved – a “natural man” – the things of God are folly to you. It’s not that you’re smarter or enlightened or have a different opinion than those who obey Scripture. It’s that you’re spiritually incapable of accepting, embracing, and obeying what God has told you to do. That’s why you see those of us who do as fools.

The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned. 1 Corinthians 2:14

Let me say it plainly. If your general trajectory in life is to consistently find yourself angered by, indifferent to, or unable to accept the plain meaning of Scripture, and your heart persists in fighting back against God’s Word even if you’ve been biblically corrected, you are almost certainly not saved.ยณ That’s not me saying that. That’s a whole lot of Scripture saying that. Regardless of how saved you feel. Despite what you may claim to be. No matter what people have told you about your salvation. God says loving Him equals walking with Him toward embracing, loving, and obeying His commands. And that includes His commands about the roles of men and women.

This is the fundamental reason most egalitarians disagree with most complementarians. It’s usually not that either side doesn’t understand what the other side stands for. It’s that both sides generally doย understand what the other side stands for and they reject the other side’s view because of where they are, spiritually.

(Addendum: After I published this article, a few people responded who seemed to misunderstand what I’ve said in this paragraph. Let me see if I can clarify:

1) You’ll notice I’ve used words/phrases (“most egalitarians,” “general trajectory,” “almost certainly,” etc.) indicating that this is a broad, general principle, not something that is universally deterministic about every single individual who has ever had an egalitarian-esque thought cross her mind.

2) I amย not saying that holding to an egalitarian viewpoint is what makes someone unsaved. Rejecting the gospel is what makes someone unsaved. What I am saying is that most people who are already false converts gravitate toward the egalitarian viewpoint as a fruit of the pre-existing condition of being unsaved. It is a logical fallacy to turn that statement around and assume I mean the converse to be true.

3) I certainly believe it is possible for genuinely regenerated Christians to have good faith, incorrect interpretations or understandings of Scripture – starting with me. When my husband and I picked out wedding vows 26 years ago, I flatly refused to use any set of vows that said I would “obey” him and only grudgingly agreed to a set that used the word “submit” instead. Embarrassingly, in our wedding video, you can clearly hear me hesitate before repeating that part of the vows. About 10-15 years ago I held a position of local denominational leadership that I’m only now beginning to see I probably, in some respects, shouldn’t have held. One reason for that is that on two or three occasions the position required me to speak to local congregations during their midweek services on a biblical topic which could not be properly addressed without explaining Scripture. Do I think I was unsaved because I thought those things were OK at the time? Of course not. But I’ll tell you this – over time, the Holy Spirit convicted me of those things and I repented. And as I’ve grown in Christ my rebellious attitudes and misunderstandings of those Scriptures and others have increasingly come under submission to God’s Word.

That’s the kind of thing we’re talking about here – the general biblical principle that saved people are on a trajectory of increasing holiness and Christlikeness. Lost people are on a trajectory of increasing disobedience and rebellion (and not strictly with regard to egalitarian ideas). It is possible to be a saved, simul justus et peccator,ย growing in holiness, desiring to please the Lord, Christian and get some non-soteriological things wrong along the way, in good faith, in the process of growing. What is not possible is for someone to be genuinely regenerated and live in a general attitude of heart-rebellion against God, His Word, and His ways (His ways in general, not strictly egalitarianism) in favor of doing life on her own terms. I don’t know how to make that more clear. That is what the Bible teaches.

4) I clearly made the statement that this article pertains to “most of the [egalitarians] who have crossed my path”. I guess what I did not make clear is that most of the egalitarians who have crossed my path have not been the small minority of genuinely regenerated Christians who have made a good faith error about Scripture’s teaching on the role of women as they’re growing in Christ. That might be your experience, but it has not been mine.ย Most of the egalitarians who have crossedย my path have clearly been of the vast majority of egalitarians who have come to that position, as I explained above, as aย result of being false converts. And it shows in their demeanor as they mock the authority of God’s Word in general, lash out in rage, blaspheme, swear, and slander, and generally display the opposite of the Fruit of the Spirit.

5) As I’ve stated many, many times in my articles, theย Bible is our authority as Christians, not a pastor or Christian leader who holds a particular position, not your loved ones who are in error but you’re certain they love Jesus, not any church or denominational structure or position that conflicts with Scripture – theย Bible. If you are going to argue against a biblical principle, you need to support your argument with rightly handled, in contextย Scripture, not examples of fallible human beings – however godly or well-intentioned they might be. Scripture is our standard, not people.)


2.
Complementarianย women don’t feel
oppressed and downtrodden.

Obviously I can’t speak for every complementarian woman out there, but I can say that of the dozens of women I know personally and the thousands who have followed me online for the last eleven years, and speaking for myself, I have never met a single, genuinely regenerated, complementarian woman who felt diminished, held back, chained up, or walked all over by the role God lays out for us in Scripture.

Do we sometimes sin by thinking and acting selfishly? Yep. Have there been husbands, pastors, and other men who have sinned against us? Of course. Do we have a bad day from time to time? Naturally. But none of that changes our delight in ourย role itself.ย Even people who have their dream jobs have nightmare moments, but there’s still nothing on the planet they’d rather do. Nothing that makes them feel more alive and fulfilled. And that’s generally how complementarian women feel about ourย job – maybe even more so, because it’s not just a job, it’s a calling from God Himself. And nobody has a better Boss than we do.

We don’t need your pity, egalitarians, any more than a kid in a candy store needs to be pitied. And we don’t need to be rescued, just like you wouldn’t think of trying to rescue a child from Disneyland. We’re not sitting around saying, “Woe is me,” and feeling like we’re losing out on life. For us, keeping God’s commands about our role is a delight and a joy, because we love Him:

For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments. And his commandments are not burdensome. 1 John 5:3

for I find my delight in your commandments, which I love. Psalm 119:47

No one is happier, more fulfilled, or more content in life than the Christian who is living in the will of God by obeying Him. No one is more miserable than a false convert who is trying to obey God through sheer force of will, or a genuine Christian living in disobedience to God’s commands.

And if all of that seems foreign or ridiculous, folly or foolishness to you, unfortunately, you’re bearing out the biblical truth I explained in section 1 of this article.


3.
Complementarian women aren’t brainwashed.

Probably the most hypocritical sexist viewpoint of egalitarians is that they assume that Christian women couldn’t possibly have come to the complementarian worldview via our own study, intellect, will, and choice. We must have been brainwashed into it by sexist, misogynistic, abusive complementarian men. But if we could somehow manage to understand the viewpoint delivered by our egalitarian saviors, we’d see the light, cast off the shackles, and be set free from all that’s holding us back.

I’m not making that up. That’s essentially the diatribe I received from one of Beth Moore’s followers recently (and I’ve heard it plenty of times before). Beth had said on Twitter that the reason she was receiving so much pushback from Christians following her announcement that she would be preaching the Sunday morning service at a local church was because sexist men were just trying to protect their positions and power. To which I responded, “What about the pushback you’re receiving from complementarian women? Are we sexist and trying to protect positions and power, too?” No, her follower angrily replied, you’ve just be brainwashed by those men.

If egalitarians can’t see how arrogant, hypocritical, and sexist it is to stand on a pedestal and declare that they’re the ones who will empower women, ensure that women are heard and valued for their independent ideas and unique contributions, and then turn around and condescendingly assume that women who have used those very independent minds they themselves tout to reach a non-egalitarian conclusion are brainwashed, I’m at a loss as to how to explain it. It’s like trying to prove water exists to someone who’s sitting in a lake while drinking a glass of ice water.

Complementarian women are not brainwashed into our worldview. We are convinced by the study of Scripture and our love for God that His plan for men and women is best, beneficial, and a blessing.


4.
Complementarian women aren’t
limited or lesser, we’re specialists.

Oh, that poor cardiologist! He’s so limited in his profession. If only he could be a General Practitioner!

I just feel terrible for that guy – he only practices civil law! He doesn’t know what he’s missing by not also practicing criminal, personal injury, estate, real estate, corporate, family, and malpractice law!

If you ever had the misfortune of hearing someone say something so ridiculous, you’d probably think she was a little off her nut. In the professional world, we normally regard specialty positions as more prestigious than more generalized positions (not that that’s right – general medicine, law, etc. are equally important). Specialists usually go to school longer and have a unique skill set for a unique segment of the population. General practitioners don’t have the luxury of focusing on a more narrow field of study. They have to be a jack of all trades – all things to all people.

But somehow, for egalitarians, that concept doesn’t translate to complementarianism. In the complementarian church, male pastors, elders, and teachers are the general practitioners. Women are the specialists. We specialize in discipling women and children, because we have a unique, God-given skill set for ministering to that unique segment of the population. God has given us the luxury and freedom to concentrate on this population He has called us to serve without the added burden of also having to teach, disciple, and oversee men.

It’s much the same in the complementarian home. The husband is like the CEO of the family. The buck stops with him. Every. single. buck. The house. The wife. The kids. The car. The yard. The bills. Everybody’s health. The extended family. The spiritual leadership. Church involvement. Provision. Decisions. Everything is ultimately on his shoulders. This leaves the wife free to specialize in being the COO of the family – day to day, boots on the ground operation of the household – an equally important position, which, again, she has a unique, God-given skill set for carrying out. While she and her husband certainly work together, God has given her the freedom and the luxury of passing everything that’s not under her purview up the chain of command for someone else to deal with. If she needs something in order to do her job, she has someone to turn to to provide it.

The egalitarian worldview looks down on women who specialize in discipling women and children in the church and being the chief operating officer in the home. Our teaching only has value if there are men in the audience, which reeks of sexism. As if men are the standard, the high bar to be set, the only ones whose mere bodily presence can validate a woman’s teaching and suddenly make it worthwhile. Who cares about teaching women and children? Men are the important ones. Our role at home is only a worthy and important one if we’re the ones calling all the shots at the macro level. Never mind that things actually have to get done and be overseen at the micro level in order for every member of the household, including the CEO, to live, grow, and flourish.

Specialties aren’t limiting or lesser. There’s an equally prestigious and necessary place for GPs and specialized medicine. For general law and specialty law. For CEOs and COOs. For complementarian men and complementarian women.

 

The egalitarian view does not value women as women. It only values women who are cheap knock-offs of men. Complementarians are the ones who value women as a separate, and equally significant, unique creation of God – not measured by how well we can imitate a man, but measured by how well we live up to all God created us to be as women. And we’re supposed to feel oppressed, limited, and lesser by that? We’d have to be brainwashed to love a worldview that values us for what we are, not for clawing and scraping toward some impossible standard and state of being God never created us to reach?

When you set men up as the standard and tell women they have to measure up to men to have any value, what you are is not egalitarian. What you are is sexist.

No thanks. I’ll take the complement.


ยนThanks to the advent of everything-but-the-pastoral-office “soft complementarianism” I should probably add an adjective, like “biblical complementarian,” but I’m not ready to concede the term yet. Complementarian means you embrace the full biblical teaching of the roles of women and men. If you compromise on that, you’re a functional egalitarian. We only need two terms.
ยฒEgalitarians make incorrect assumptions about complementarian men, too, the main one being that they’re sexist, misogynistic, even abusive. Please. I’ll let complementarian men speak to that themselves, or this article will be way too long.
ยณSometimes people who are genuinely saved worry that they’re not. If you’re concerned about your salvation, I encourage you to work through my studyย AM I REALLY SAVED?: A 1 JOHN CHECK-UP,ย and make an appointment with your pastor if you need counsel.