Discernment

Alistair Begg

If you are considering commenting or sending me an e-mail objecting to the fact that I warn against certain teachers, please click here and read this article first. Your objection is most likely answered here. I won’t be publishing comments or answering emails that are answered by this article.


This article is kept continuously updated as needed.

I get lots of questions about particular authors, pastors, and Bible teachers, and whether or not I recommend them. Some of the best known can be found above at my Popular False Teachers tab. The teacher below is someone I’ve been asked about recently, so I’ve done a quick check (this is brief research, not exhaustive) on him.

Generally speaking, in order for me to recommend a teacher, speaker, or author, he or she has to meet three criteria:

a) A female teacher cannot currently and unrepentantly preach to or teach men in violation of 1 Timothy 2:12. A male teacher or pastor cannot allow women to carry out this violation of Scripture in his ministry. The pastor or teacher cannot currently and unrepentantly be living in any other sin (for example, cohabiting with her boyfriend or living as a homosexual).

b) The pastor or teacher cannot currently and unrepentantly be partnering with or frequently appearing with false teachers. This is a violation of Scripture.

c) The pastor or teacher cannot currently and unrepentantly be teaching false doctrine.

I am not very familiar with most of the teachers I’m asked about (there are so many out there!) and have not had the opportunity to examine their writings or hear them speak, so most of the “quick checking” I do involves items a and b (although in order to partner with false teachers (b) it is reasonable to assume their doctrine is acceptable to the false teacher and that they are not teaching anything that would conflict with the false teacher’s doctrine). Partnering with false teachers and women preaching to men are each sufficient biblical reasons not to follow a pastor, teacher, or author, or use his/her materials.

Just to be clear, “not recommended” is a spectrum. On one end of this spectrum are people like Nancy Leigh DeMoss Wolgemuth and Kay Arthur. These are people I would not label as false teachers because their doctrine is generally sound, but because of some red flags I’m seeing with them, you won’t find me proactively endorsing them or suggesting them as a good resource, either. There are better people you could be listening to. On the other end of the spectrum are people like Joyce Meyer and Rachel Held Evans- complete heretics whose teachings, if believed, might lead you to an eternity in Hell. Most of the teachers I review fall somewhere in the middle of this spectrum (leaning toward the latter).

If you’d like to check out some pastors and teachers I heartily recommend, click the Recommended Bible Teachers tab at the top of this page.


photo courtesy of Truth For Life on Facebook

Alistair Begg has been in pastoral ministry since 1975. Following graduation from The London School of Theology, he served eight years in Scotland at both Charlotte Chapel in Edinburgh and Hamilton Baptist Church. In 1983, he became the senior pastor at Parkside Church near Cleveland, Ohio. He has written several books and is heard daily and weekly on the radio program, Truth For Life.”

Alistair Begg has a long and solid history as a doctrinally sound pastor and Bible teacher. Until a few years ago, he was one of the featured teachers at my Recommended Bible Teachers page. I was pleased and happy to recommend him to my followers as a trustworthy teacher of Scripture.

Unfortunately, in mid- to late 2022, one of my followers made me aware of a 2019 sermon Begg had preached in which he endorsed the idea of a woman preaching or teaching the Sunday morning message in church (in other words, preaching/teaching to men) as long as she has been invited and given permission to do so by the pastor and elders. Begg has invited and permitted at least one woman to do this at his own church. This is unbiblical.

It was the second (see below) significant red flag with Begg that I had become aware of, and I was disappointed to have to remove him from my list of recommended teachers. But, having removed other teachers for similar things, I felt that in order to be fair and consistent about who I recommend, it had to be done.

Listen as Begg explains in his own words in this sermon (starting around 30:12) on 1 Timothy 2:9-15b. (I would encourage you to listen to the whole sermon โ€“ in which he says many good things โ€“ for context.)

Christian Women (2) โ€“ Alistair Begg | September 16, 2019

Transcript of relevant portion, beginning at 30:50:

“…One of the chestnuts that always comes up says, “Well you did that thing on 1 Timothy 2 and then you had Helen Roseveare here come to the church. Nananananana. And she spoke on a Sunday morning, and she’s not allowed to speak on Sunday mornings because of first Timothy.”

Yes, she’s allowed to speak on Sunday mornings if the elders determined that we’d like her to. She’s not going to speak as the pastor and the teacher. She is not going to speak in a position of rule and authority, but she has something to say and we’d like to hear it.

There are women who have unique abilities in relationship to, for example, dealing with bereavement. And if that woman has something to share with a fellowship in the context of the Lord’s Day worship then she can come and share it providing it does not negate all that we have said.

In other words, loved ones, we can’t take a principle and make a law out of it. And legalists always make laws out of principles.

Again, this is unbiblical. When God says no – especially in a pastoral epistle like 1 Timothy, instructing pastors about how to run God’s church – no pastor has the right to say yes. Pastors have no right to give anyone permission to sin. Alistair Begg’s personal opinion that a woman who speaks in his church is not speaking “as the pastor and the teacher” or “in a position of rule and authority” is not the deciding factor here. God has commanded pastors that women are not to pastor, preach, teach the Scriptures to men, or exercise authority over men in the gathering of the Body. And when God tells us not to do something and we do it anyway because “we’d like her to” or “we’d like to hear it,” that is sin.

I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.

1 Timothy 2:12

Furthermore, it is not “legalistic” (as Begg unbiblically judged those who apparently took him to task at the time) to boldly declare that Christians must obey any rightly handled, in context command of Scripture. Begg can call 1 Timothy 2:12 a law, a principle, or whatever he wants, it doesn’t change the fact that God said, “Don’t do it,” and Begg said, “I want to, so I’m going to.”.

Several questions have arisen about Helen Roseveare: whether or not she was a missionary, the content of what she said at Begg’s church, and the possibility that she may have been giving a personal testimony.

None of that matters as it pertains to the issue at hand. The red flag is what Begg said about it in his sermon, which I’ve just addressed.


Prior to my follower making me aware of the incident above, the first red flag I was (already) aware of also happened in 2019, just a couple of months after the incident above. Alistair Begg announced that he would be speaking at Baylor Universityโ€™s National Preaching Conference, sharing the stage with Beth Moore (also Tony Evans and others), much to the chagrin of and numerous protests from his followers. In response to a follower who expressed concern, a statement1 from Beggโ€™s ministry indicated that he accepted the invitation to speak without knowing who any of the other speakers were. Rather than going to the organizers and explaining that he could not share the stage with:

  • false teachers (Tony Evans and Beth Moore),
  • a woman who preaches to men (Beth Moore),
  • a woman “pastor” (Mary Hulst),

and that he could not speak at a conference at which pastors and future pastors -men- were being instructed in pastoring by two women – sanctioned by the seminary and voluntarily attended by these men – Begg kept the speaking engagement.

I did not remove Begg from my recommends at the time of the Baylor incident because I was hoping it was a one time goof that would teach him to use greater wisdom and discernment in the future. We all do dumb things from time to time, and well known pastors are no exception.

The Baylor incident following so quickly on the heels of the “women preaching incident” (above), was troublesome. And Beggโ€™s statements in the women preaching incident are not a one time lapse in judgment. They are the well thought out, planned, and implemented policy of the church he pastors.

Once might be an “oopsie”. Twice was the beginning of a pattern of Begg doing or saying unbiblical things and then either doubling down, or lashing out, or both at those who tried to biblically correct him.


In this September 2023 episode of Truth for Life entitled The Christian Manifesto (an interview with Begg about his recently released book by the same title), he explains how a grandmother wrote to him asking for counsel about whether or not to attend her grandsonโ€™s โ€œweddingโ€ to a trans-gender person. With seemingly no qualms whatsoever, he advised her that, as long as her grandson knew she didnโ€™t approve, she should not only attend the wedding but take a gift as well. In Beggโ€™s reasoning, refusing to attend the โ€œweddingโ€ would just reinforce the grandsonโ€™s opinion that Christians are mean, unloving, etc. Ironically, he then immediately quoted James 3:1.

Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness.

James 3:1

โ€˜The Christian Manifestoโ€™ Interview | September 17, 2023

Transcript of relevant portion, beginning at 28:45:

โ€œโ€ฆwe field questions all the time that go along the lines of my grandson is about to be married to a transgender person and I donโ€™t know what to do about this, and Iโ€™m calling to ask you to tell me what to do. Which is a huge responsibility.

And in a conversation like that just a few days ago โ€“ and people may not like this answer โ€“ but I asked I asked the grandmother, โ€œDoes your grandson understand your belief in Jesus?โ€

โ€œYes.โ€

โ€œDoes your grandson understand that your belief in Jesus makes it such that you canโ€™t countenance in any affirming way the choices that he has made in life?โ€

โ€œYes.โ€

I said, โ€œWell then, okay, as long as he knows that then I suggest that you do go to the ceremony, and I suggest that you buy them a gift.โ€

โ€œOh!โ€ she said. She was caught off guard. I said, โ€œWell hereโ€™s the thing, your love for them may catch them off guard. But your absence will simply reinforce the fact that they said these people are what I always thought: judgmental, critical, unprepared to countenance anything.โ€

And it is a fine line isnโ€™t it? It really is, and people need to work out their own salvation with fear and trembling. But I think weโ€™re going to take that risk, weโ€™re going to have to take that risk a lot more if we want to build bridges into the hearts and lives of those who donโ€™t understand Jesus and and donโ€™t understand that he is a king.

This is pastoral malpractice, and is the very reason God included James 3:1 in His Word. Our personal opinions about someoneโ€™s anticipated reaction is not what governs our actions as Christians โ€“ Scripture does. We are to obey Scripture regardless of what we think the outcome will be. And in this case Scripture tells us:

  • Marriage is between one man and one woman Genesis 2:20-24
  • Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous. Hebrews 13:4
  • Weโ€™re not to be ashamed of the gospel โ€“ a major component of which is โ€œthe wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of menโ€ (Romans 1:16-18) โ€“ rather, weโ€™re to be willing to shed our own blood for obedience to Scripture (Hebrews 12:4). Compromising with sin is one form of being ashamed of the gospel.
  • Weโ€™re to abstain from even the appearance of evil. (1 Thessalonians 5:22)
  • Jesus did not come to bring peace between pagans and Christians, but a sword, and anyone who puts loyalty to family ahead of loyalty to Jesus and His Word is not worthy of Him: I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a personโ€™s enemies will be those of his own household. Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matthew 10:34-39
  • If even pagans arenโ€™t to give approval to sin, how much less are Christians to give approval to sin? Romans 1:32
  • are not those who eat the sacrifices participants in the altar?โ€ฆ I do not want you to be participants with demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons. 1 Corinthians 10:18-21
  • Do notโ€ฆtake part in the sins of others; 1 Timothy 5:22
  • He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous are both alike an abomination to the Lord. Proverbs 17:15

Anyone, pagan or Christian, who knows anything about weddings (and Begg, a pastor who performs them, certainly should) can tell you that by being a non-objecting witness at a wedding, you are making the statement that you support and approve of the union. Why would any pastor suborn the sin of hypocrisy by encouraging a Christian to express disapproval of the union and then turn right around and demonstrate support for the union by joyfully attending the โ€œweddingโ€ with a gift? And, in the future, how is the grandmother, when sharing the gospel with her grandson, to call her grandson to repent of his sin when she has already approved of its codification by attending his โ€œweddingโ€? More hypocrisy!

Furthermore, though the grandson may know of the grandmotherโ€™s biblical disapproval, does his โ€œintendedโ€ know? Does the rest of the wedding party, the officiant, and all of the other guests know? Do all of her friends who know sheโ€™s attending the wedding know? To all of them, many of whom will know sheโ€™s a professing Christian, her attendance means she approves of the โ€œmarriageโ€. (All of these are also reasons Christians donโ€™t attend homosexual โ€œweddingsโ€.)

Shortly after the video above went viral in late January 2024, American Family Radio, which carries Beggโ€™s Truth for Life program on 1800 radio stations, contacted TFL leadership to plead with Begg to repent. He doubled down on his position, and AFR made the decision to stop carrying TFL.

A few days later, in his sermon at church, Begg addressed the backlash and calls to repentance he had received by saying he had no intention of repenting and had nothing to repent of. He then proceeded to cast those who decried his unbiblical advice to the grandmother as โ€œPhariseesโ€ and the older brother in Lukeโ€™s account of the prodigal son.

Begg was subsequently disinvited from speaking at the 2024 Shepherds Conference, and TFL was dropped from (Ligonier’s) RefNet’s lineup.

For more details and links regarding this incident, please listen to Talk Back: Alistair Begg at A Word Fitly Spoken, and check the show notes for more links.

Alistair Begg is not a new Christian or a young pastor who made a rookie mistake. This question should be a no-brainer for any Christian, let alone a seasoned pastor with many decades of experience and a world-wide public ministry. Counseling a sheep to base her behavior on a sinnerโ€™s opinions and feelings rather than to submit to and obey Godโ€™s clear Word, refusal to repent when corrected, and mishandling Godโ€™s Word belies a foundational problem with his theology as do his aforementioned errors. And because of that, I believe we will continue to see Begg make these kinds of blatant errors in the future.

In September of 2024, about nine months after the scandal broke regarding his advice to the grandmother, Alistair Begg announced that he would be retiring as pastor of Parkside Church. June 8, 2025 was his last day as pastor, but he remains active at Truth for Life and continues to speak at various venues.


Iโ€™m not saying Begg is a heretic on par with Benny Hinn or Kenneth Copeland. Far from it. I donโ€™t even consider him to be a false teacher at this time. I just no longer feel comfortable saying, โ€œHey, this is a great teacher. I recommend that you follow him,โ€ (i.e. putting him on my list of recommended teachers) when there are others I decline to recommend who also unrepentantly hold the same or similar erroneous positions.

Earlier in the “women preaching” sermon Begg humbly admits (as should every good pastor) that he and his church donโ€™t claim to have everything right, but that they will continue to grow in Christ and make corrections. If and when he corrects his errors (and any others that might come to light), and publicly repents, Iโ€™ll be delighted to reconsider him for inclusion on my Recommended Teachers list. Until that time, however, I cannot recommend that you follow him.


1This is not a website I endorse. It is linked only as evidence of the statements in this paragraph.

Evangelism, Gospel, Salvation, Sin, Throwback Thursday

Wayback Wednesday ~ The Gospel According to Lot

Originally published February 26, 2013

Then the men said to Lot, โ€œHave you anyone else here? Sons-in-law, sons, daughters, or anyone you have in the city, bring them out of the place. For we are about to destroy this place, because the outcry against its people has become great before the Lord, and the Lord has sent us to destroy it.โ€ So Lot went out and said to his sons-in-law, who were to marry his daughters, โ€œUp! Get out of this place, for the Lord is about to destroy the city.โ€ But he seemed to his sons-in-law to be jesting.
Genesis 19:12-14

The story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah would make an epic movie. Youโ€™ve got your good guys: Abraham, Lot, and the angels. Your bad guys: everybody else in town. Violence, dramatic tension, a narrow escape, major pyrotechnics, and the good guys take the day. Epic, I tell you.

But thatโ€™s just whatโ€™s happening on the surface.

If you look closely, you can see the light of the gospel casting a shadow over Sodom. A shadow thatโ€™s the size and shape of a cross.

If you look closely, you can see the light of the gospel casting a shadow over Sodom. A shadow thatโ€™s the size and shape of a cross.

The city of Sodom was so wicked that God personally came down to deal with it. Judgment was coming. There was hell to payโ€”quite literally.

God revealed His plan of destruction to Lot, His only follower in Sodom. But God didnโ€™t stop there. Did Lot have anyone in town that needed to be rescued from the coming devastation? Hurry! Go get them and urge them to flee!

โ€œMy sons-in-law!โ€ thought Lot. Perhaps he raced out the back door, slipped carefully past any of the blinded mob left on his front porch, and scurried surreptitiously through town to avoid other hostile neighbors. Arriving at the respective homes of the two men betrothed to his daughters, he must have pleaded with them to drop everything and come with him. It was the only way they could be saved.

But they wouldnโ€™t go with him. They didnโ€™t believe him.

hp-crossshadow

The next morning, judgment came. And that handful of peopleโ€”righteous Lot, and those who believed with him that God would save them if they left everything behind and followed Himโ€”were the only ones spared.

Is that shadow becoming clearer?

This world is a frightfully wicked place. And, one day, God is going to come down personally to deal with it. Judgment is coming. It will be swift, it will be terrible, and it will be final. God has revealed this to us in His word. He has also revealed to us, His followers, the plan of escape: Jesus.

But God doesnโ€™t stop there. Do we have friends and loved ones who need to be rescued from the very real and eternal hellfire and brimstone that await them if they stay in the Sodom of their sin?

Jesus tells us to โ€œgo out andโ€ฆcompel them to come inโ€ (Luke 14:23), and that they โ€œmust be born againโ€ (John 3:7).

This isnโ€™t some kind of โ€œGod loves you and has a wonderful plan for your lifeโ€ game weโ€™re playing here. Itโ€™s urgent, a matter of life and death.

This isnโ€™t some kind of โ€œGod loves you and has a wonderful plan for your lifeโ€ game weโ€™re playing here. Itโ€™s urgent, a matter of life and death.

Eternal life. Eternal death.

And Godโ€™s way is the only way out.

God didnโ€™t offer Lotโ€™s sons-in-law the option of having their cake and eating it, too, by remaining in Sodom and being saved from His wrath. And it doesnโ€™t work that way for us either. We donโ€™t get to have Jesus and continue to rebel against Him by remaining in our sin.

Just as Lotโ€™s sons-in-law could not survive Godโ€™s judgment any other way than fleeing the sin of Sodom and following Godโ€™s escape route, there is only one way we may escape. We must flee from our sin and into the forgiving arms of our crucified and risen Savior.

This is the gospel with which we must compel them. It is the only gospel that saves.

“If sinners will be damned, at least let them leap to hell over our bodies. And if they will perish, let them perish with our arms around their knees, imploring them to stay. If hell must be filled, at least let it be filled in the teeth of our exertions, and let not one go there unwarned and unprayed for. – C.H. Spurgeon.

Do you know Jesus as your Savior? Are you certain?

Mailbag

The Mailbag: Regrets…I Still Have a Few

Originally published March 16, 2020

I know regret should lead us to repentance. My question is: After repentance and salvation what do we do with regret? Is it sinful to continually experience regret? Is it just a consequence we must live with? I feel like Iโ€™m being swallowed up by it the more I read the Bible, which is not the end of the world, but I just want to handle it correctly.

Great question. I think correct context and semantics can help us out a lot here.

The verse you’re referring to is 2 Corinthians 7:10 (which I have linked in context in your question above):

For godly grief produces a repentance that leads to salvation without regret, whereas worldly grief produces death.

There are several concepts at play here between your question and the verse, and we need to be sure we’re not conflating them: regret, godly sorrow or grief, shame, and guilt.

When we American English speakers say, Frank Sinatra-style, “Regrets….I’ve had a few….,” what we mean is that there are things we’ve done in the past that we wish we hadn’t done, and that if we had it to do over again, we would do things differently. Every Christian has had incidents we feel this way about, whether they took place before or after we got saved. If your love for Christ and your growing understanding of the blackness of sin have led you to regret rebelling against Him, that’s not a bad thing. What would be bad is if you had no regrets. When we look back on past sins, we should always do so with an attitude of regret for having committed them.

But doesn’t this verse say repentance leads to salvation “without regret”? Yes. But that phrase doesn’t mean we’ll never look back at our past sins and wish we had obeyed God instead. Read the verse in context. Paul had written his “severe letter” rebuking the Corinthian church for their sin. It cut them to the heart in godly sorrow over their transgressions and they joyfully repented, never once looking back and wishing for their old way of life. Even with the hardships and persecution many first century Christians faced, they never, for a single moment, regretted turning from their life of sin and following Jesus. (I think we could all say a hearty “Amen!” to that!) That’s what “salvation without regret” means- we don’t regret casting our lot with Christ.

Another aspect of this verse and question we need to address is this: The verse doesn’t say our regrets produce repentance that leads to salvation. It says “godly grief”, or “sorrow,” or “sorrow that is according to the will of God,” is what produces repentance that leads to salvation. There’s a big difference.

Regrets are more in line with the “worldly grief” mentioned at the end of the verse, which produces death. Even lost people like Ol’ Blue Eyes can look back over their lives and recall their embarrassing or jerky behavior and the choices they made that hurt others or themselves, and they can wish they hadn’t done those things. Why? Because of the natural consequences of sin. He got caught. He lost his job or his wife or a friend.

He had to pay the piper, and he didn’t like the looks of the bill.

Not a thought to the Lord whose laws he broke. Not a twinge of guilt and shame for committing sins that crucified the Savior who loves him. No fear and trembling at the feet of a thrice holy God of wrath who has the power to cast him into Hell for all eternity.

That is godly grief. It’s a grief that goes vertical first…

I have offended a high and holy God.

Woe unto me, for I am a man of unclean lips!

Against Thee, and Thee only, have I sinned.

Father, I am no longer worthy to be called your son.

Oh, wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death?

…and then, springing from that godly grief, seeks horizontal forgiveness from and reconciliation with others.

When godly grief over sin produces repentance, repentance leads to salvation. And when Christ saves you, a transaction takes place in God’s legal system in which Christ absorbs the shame, guilt, and penalty for your sin, and God, the righteous Judge, rules you not guilty.

But what can you do when you’ve been genuinely saved and you look back at your past sin not only with regret, but also feeling the weight of guilt and shame? I think maybe that’s the heart of what you’re asking.

You have to hold on to what you know to be true according to God’s Word over and above what you feel. God’s Word is objectively trustworthy. Our feelings are not. Our feelings can be fickle and fleshly. Subjective and deceptive. We have to tame those feelings like wild horses with the bit, bridle, and spurs of Scripture, and rein them in or turn them in the direction God wants them to go.

So what do we know to be true about feeling guilt and shame for our past sin?

โ€ข Whatever we may feel, the fact is that, in Christ, we are not guilty, and our shame has been removed:

I give thanks to my God always for you because of the grace of God that was given you in Christ Jesus…who will sustain you to the end, guiltless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Corinthians 1:4,8

โ€œFear not, for you will not be ashamed; be not confounded, for you will not be disgraced; for you will forget the shame of your youth, and the reproach of your widowhood you will remember no more. For your Maker is your husband, the Lord of hosts is his name; and the Holy One of Israel is your Redeemer, the God of the whole earth he is called. Isaiah 54:4-5

โ€ข It isn’t God who is leading us to feel a way that doesn’t line up with His Word. Satan is the only one who makes false accusations against Christians:

And I heard a loud voice in heaven, saying, โ€œNow the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ have come, for the accuser of our brothers has been thrown down, who accuses them day and night before our God. Revelation 12:10

โ€ข It is not God’s will for us to focus on the past, but to move forward like the Christians we are, keeping our eyes on Jesus:

But one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus. Let those of us who are mature think this way, and if in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal that also to you. Only let us hold true to what we have attained. Philippians 3:13b-16

Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us, looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God. Hebrews 12:1-2

When you look back on your former life and are overwhelmed by guilt and shame, remember the words above are from the very lips of God Himself. Remember that you were guilty and covered with shame, and let that knowledge lead you to thank, praise, and worship the One who took your sin and wretchedness upon His own shoulders. Who absorbed your punishment, your blame – and set you free. Free to honor and obey Him. Free to glorify Him and enjoy Him forever.

Additional Resources

The Mailbag: Regrets, Iโ€™ve had aย fewโ€ฆmore.

Guilt and Shame- Burden orย Blessing?


If you have a question about: a Bible passage, an aspect of theology, a current issue in Christianity, or how to biblically handle a family, life, or church situation, comment below (Iโ€™ll hold all questions in queue {unpublished} for a future edition of The Mailbag) or send me an e-mail or private message. If your question is chosen for publication, your anonymity will be protected.

Uncategorized

New Year, New Look!

Time to spiff up the joint a little!

I love this amazing new branding work my friend Amanda created for me for the blog and my social media platforms. She does beautiful work, and if you have any branding or marketing needs – and if you love supporting Christian-owned small businesses – I hope you’ll connect with Amanda Hess Marketing on Facebook or Instagram.

Apologetics, Evangelism, Movies

Throwback Thursday ~ Movie Time- The Atheist Delusion

Originally published November 1, 2016

Ever heard of atheist Richard Dawkins’ bookย The God Delusion? It was Dawkins’ attempt to prove that the concept of God is irrational and even harmful. In today’s movie,ย The Atheist Delusion, evangelist Ray Comfort of Living Waters, demonstrates how irrational and harmful it isย not to believe in God. Ray interviews several atheists, presenting the evidence to help them to see how their beliefs lack a logical foundation. But simply acknowledging the existence of God isn’t enough, and Ray transitions beautifully from apologetics to the gospel, pleading with sinners to trust Christ as Savior.

If you’ve ever been intimidated by the thought of witnessing to an atheist, The Atheist Delusion is a tool that can help equip you. And, if you have friends or loved ones who are atheists, pass this along to them and ask them to watch. It’s a great way to share the gospel.