Abortion

Abolition or Pro-Life?

Originally published June 8, 2022

Sanctity of Life Sunday is this Sunday, January 18.

Do you know the differences between the abolition movement and the pro-life movement? It’s a good thing for all Christians to be informed about.

Watch A Storm Comes Rolling Down the Plain, then listen in to our A Word Fitly Spoken interview with Brett Baggett, one of the key figures in the documentary.

The position of the abolition movement is that it should be spearheaded by the church, and so most of the leaders of the movement and activities are pastors and other men. But women play a vital role in the abolition movement, too. Listen in as Susan White tells us how to get involved.

I also thought this interview with Samuel Sey, Nathaniel Jolly, and Ekkie Tepsupornchai on the Truth Be Known podcast was insightful and helpful:


Additional Resources:

Basic Training: Abortion

Movie Time: Babies Are (Still) Murdered Here

Guest Post ~ On the Subject of Abortion

Rescue Those

Free the States

Abortion, Basic Training

Basic Training: Abortion

For more in theย Basic Trainingย series, clickย here.


I rarely write on abortion. But it’s not because I don’t feel strongly about it. It’s because it seems like it should be a given. That Christians shouldn’t have to be told that we don’t support abortion any more than we have to be told to breathe or eat. When I think about writing about abortion, I think, “What could I possibly say that hasn’t already been said a million times, and by people who have more experience in this arena than I do?”.

But the more I look out over the landscape of contemporary Christianity, the more I realize we can’t take any aspect of theology for granted. Because when we take the basics for granted, they don’t get taught to the next generation and we end up assuming they know things they don’t actually know. And that’s on us – those of us who knew and didn’t properly and explicitly train those who came behind us.

So if you’re recently saved and you’ve just walked in to this brand new, unfamiliar, and counter-intuitive worldview of biblical Christianity, or if you grew up around some form of evangelicalism but nobody ever took the time to sit you down and teach you properly, let’s look at some of the basics about abortion.

๐Ÿผ Abortion is murder. When you intentionally and unjustly end an innocent human life, that is murder. Abortion takes a living human being (it’s not a chicken or a hippo or a platypus) and intentionally and unjustly causes the death (causes heart, brain, and all other organ functions to cease) of said human being. That’s not even a theological argument, that’s a medical fact.

๐Ÿผ A baby in utero is not part of the “mother’s body.” The pro-abortion side often makes comments like, “No one has the right to tell a woman what she can and can’t do with her body.” This argument is beneath the intelligence of most of the people who make it for a couple of reasons: 

First, we tell men, women, and children what they can and can’t do with their bodies all the time. Children can’t use their bodies to drive a car or serve in the military. Men can’t use their bodies to rape. Women can’t use their bodies for prostitution. People can’t sell their kidneys for transplant. See how that works?

Second, this isn’t the twelfth, or fifteenth, or eighteenth century. Modern science has left in the dust any notion that a baby is an appendage of his mother’s body like her arm or her liver. Pre-born babies have their own unique DNA, blood type, heartbeat, organ systems, and so on. When we say a woman shouldn’t have an abortion, we aren’t telling a woman what to do with her own body … except in the sense that we are telling her she can’t use her body to murder someone else. (Which, technically, is already a law that pertains to both men and women.) A pre-born baby may be dependent on his mother for food, shelter, and care, but so is her two-year-old, and, so far, no one is using that line of reasoning to suggest it’s OK to kill a child of that age. Yet.

And, finally, if you’re a genuinely regenerated Christian who is holding on to the “my body my choice” mantra, your body, your life, and your eternity were bought and paid for by Christ. He owns you, and He has every right to tell you what to do with your body. It doesn’t matter one whit what people say you can or can’t do.

If you’re a genuinely regenerated Christian who is holding on to the “my body my choice” mantra, you were bought and paid for by Christ. He owns you and has every right to tell you what to do with your body.

๐Ÿผ Abortion is never necessary to save the mother’s life. Numerous OB/GYNs and other medical professionals have stated this publicly. In cases in which the mother’s life and/or health are at stake (including ectopic pregnancies), the biblical and medically ethical approach is to make every attempt to save both the mother and child (which can often be done through early delivery, not abortion). If the child dies during the attempt to save him and his mother, that is a grievous tragedy, but it is not an abortion. Abortion is the intentional, proactive killing of a child.

Abortion is NEVER necessary to save the mother’s life.

๐Ÿผ Medical care for miscarriage and stillbirth is not an abortion. This is like saying that burying someone who has died is the same as murdering that person. In a miscarriage and stillbirth, the baby has already died in utero of natural or accidental causes. Abortion is proactively and intentionally killing a living pre-born baby.

Medical care for miscarriage and stillbirth is NOT an abortion.

๐Ÿผ Rape and incest are horrible sins that no one should ever be subjected to, but in the tiny number of pregnancies that result from these heinous crimes, we do not execute the child for the sin of his father. The Bible is clear on that. And the practical results of obeying this biblical mandate bear out its truth. The overwhelming majority of women who get an abortion after having been raped regret it and say it caused additional trauma, while women who go through with their pregnancies after rape do not.

The overwhelming majority of women who get an abortion after having been raped regret it and say it caused additional trauma.

๐Ÿผ Because abortion is murder, it is a sin. If you have ever performed, assisted in, encouraged, or received an abortion, you have committed the sin of murder. You are a murderer. It is good and right for you to feel guilty about that and to grieve over both the sinful person you are who has offended a holy God, and to grieve for the life of your baby. Don’t try to skip feeling your guilt and grief over this sin. It’s a vital part of the process of dealing with it biblically and in an emotionally healthy way.

๐Ÿผ If you’re counseling someone post-abortion, I know it can be painful to watch, but you must let her process through the guilt that comes with this sin. Don’t immediately skip ahead to forgiveness. She can’t get to repentance and forgiveness if she has nothing to repent of and ask forgiveness for. 

๐Ÿผ Also if you’re counseling someone post-abortion, do not just give her blanket absolution. I recently heard a pastor (with the best of intentions, I’m sure) stand in the pulpit and rightly call abortion a sin, and also rightly offer women Christ’s forgiveness of that sin. But he skipped the middle part where you have to confess and repent of your sin and ask Christ for forgiveness. That’s not a step that can be skipped for abortion or any other sin.

๐Ÿผ If you repent of the sin of abortion, Christ will forgive you and make you clean. He delights to cleanse the foulest of sinners and welcome them into His Kingdom with open arms of grace and mercy. Trust Him to keep His promise to forgive you.

๐Ÿผ Christians should support doctrinally sound anti-abortion endeavors. Volunteering at crisis pregnancy centers, donating to anti-abortion causes and services, adopting, housing and providing for pregnant women who need assistance, supporting Christian orphanages, etc. Just be discerning and check out the theology of the organization first.

๐Ÿผย Christians should not join with apostate “churches” or other religions in anti-abortion causes.ย The Bible is absolutely clear that we are not to partner in ministry endeavors with unbelievers, especially those who claim to be Christians or teach false doctrine.ย (Yes, this includes Catholics. They may be very nice people and they’ve been fighting against abortion for a long time, but Catholic doctrine anathematizes the gospel and biblical Christianity.) Partnering with unbelievers who claim to be Christians is an even more dangerous sin than abortion because it confuses people about what salvation is and muddies the gospel. It sends the message that you can believe things contrary to Scripture and still be saved, and that is a message that sends people to an eternity in Hell. Plus, it doesn’t make any sense to commit one sin in order to fight against another sin. That is not God’s way nor is it in keeping with His Word.

๐Ÿผ For Christians, abortion should be our highest priority litmus test when it comes to deciding which candidate to vote for. If you’re willing to have children murdered so you can get more money back in your tax refund, or better highways, or more social programs, or whatever, your attitude is anti-Christ. Where would we be if Jesus had had such a selfish, self-serving worldview? Christianity says, “I’ll lay down my life for you,” not, “You lay down your life for me.”. Besides, if your candidate is so ensconced in evil that he advocates murdering children, he won’t think twice about a lesser sin like breaking the very campaign promises that caused you to vote for him in the first place.

๐Ÿผ Pastors, youth pastors, and teachers in our churches need to clearly and proactively preach and teach what the Bible says about sex and abortion through the lens of the gospel. Having a largely regenerate congregation will prevent abortions primarily through girls and women getting saved, but having a gospel-saturated culture in your church will also encourage those who do sin sexually and get pregnant to reach out to a brother or sister – instead of an abortion clinic – for help.

๐Ÿผ God is the creator, sustainer, and giver of life. If He values life so much, how can we who claim to be His followers treat a human life as inconvenient, cheap, and expendable when it suits our own selfish purposes?

For you formed my inward parts;
you knitted me together in my mother’s womb.
I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.
Wonderful are your works;
my soul knows it very well.
My frame was not hidden from you,
when I was being made in secret,
intricately woven in the depths of the earth.
Your eyes saw my unformed substance;
in your book were written, every one of them,
the days that were formed for me,
when as yet there was none of them.
Psalm 139:13-16

Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord,
the fruit of the womb a reward.
Psalm 127:3

Abortion is the murder of a human being. You cannot support that at any level if you truly belong to Christ. If you’re a Christian, you must submit your attitudes and actions regarding abortion to the teaching of Scripture, and obey God’s Word.


Additional Resources:

Guest Post ~ On the Subject of Abortion

Abolition or Pro-Life?

Rescue Those

Free the States

Abortion, Movies

Movie Time: Babies Are (Still) Murdered Here

Originally published November 12, 2019

What’s really going on behind the scenes in the pro-life movement? Why incrementalism instead of abolition? What’s the real solution to the tragedy and outrage of abortion?

Recently released from Apologia Studios, Babies Are Still Murdered Here is the follow up documentary to Babies Are Murdered Here (see below – you may want to watch it first if you haven’t already seen it). It explores the inner workings of pro-life politics, explains more efficient ways to work through the system to end abortion, and demonstrates why the gospel is the real solution to abortion. You’ll hear from pastors and politicians, parents and practitioners, as they point us to the urgent need to do away with abortion altogether, now.

Babies Are Murdered Here was released almost six years ago. It is an overview of abortion culture, BAMH clinic ministry, and a biblical response to abortion.

(For those like me who have a more sensitive nature, there are no visual images of aborted children in these films. There are a few, very brief verbal descriptions of abortion technique and a brief news clip of the Kermit Gosnell story.)

To find out more about these films and how you and your church can get involved in helping to completely end abortion in your community, visit End Abortion Now.

Additional Resources:

Basic Training: Abortion

Guest Post ~ On the Subject of Abortion

Abolition or Pro-Life?

Rescue Those

Free the States

Abortion, Gospel

Planned Parenthood: There, But for the Grace of God…

Originally published August 15, 2015

You walk into your doctorโ€™s office for your annual check upโ€”flu shot, cancer, cholesterol and blood sugar screening, blood pressure checkโ€”you know, routine maintenance on the olโ€™ bod. Youโ€™ve chosen this doctor because you donโ€™t have health insurance and heโ€™s kind enough to lower his prices and work with you on a payment plan. His office is clean and bright, beautifully decorated, and the staff is always friendly. You even get a lollipop at the end of each visit.

But this year, as youโ€™re walking down the hall to exam room four, you happen to notice that in exam room three, thereโ€™s a playpen in the corner with an adorable baby girl in it, cooing away and playing with a toy.

โ€œOdd,โ€ you think, since this is not a pediatricianโ€™s office. You continue to your own room, don that scratchy paper gown, and wait for the doctor. By the time he comes in and begins the exam, you can no longer contain your curiosity. Whose baby is it? Why is there even a baby in the office?

โ€œOh, yes,โ€ the doctor says matter of factly, โ€œthat baby was abandoned by her parents. Nobody wants her, so when I get finished with your check up, Iโ€™m going to torture her to death and then sell her organs to medical researchers.โ€

Your jaw hits the floor. Your stomach turns. You canโ€™t believe the monstrous words youโ€™ve just heard.

โ€œHow could you do such a horrible thing?โ€ you scream over your revulsion. The doctor looks surprised that you should ask.

โ€œItโ€™s really no big deal,โ€ he says. โ€œWe only do a few of those a week. The vast majority of my practice is providing health care and counseling for patients like you.โ€

Let me ask you somethingโ€”would you use that doctor and think that the care he provides you mitigates his atrocious behavior? I hope not. Yet I have heard people defend Planned Parenthood (an organization which has been torturing babies to death for decades, and,ย we recently learned, profits from the sale of their organs) because Planned Parenthood ostensibly performs a minimum number of abortions and mainly provides health services, such as the ones mentioned above, to women who need them. Somehow, in these peopleโ€™s minds, the health care Planned Parenthood provides makes up for the heinous murders they commit day after day.

Does it really all balance out? Of course not.

In fact, letโ€™s say, Planned Parenthood had only ever tortured fifty babies to death (instead of the millions theyโ€™ve actually killed). And letโ€™s say they provided free health care to everyone on the planet, cured cancer, and brought about world peace. Those are some wonderful things, but does it erase the fact that they brutally ended fifty innocent lives? Do all those good deeds make up for even one murder?

No. They donโ€™t. Good deeds can never make up for heinous crimes. Planned Parenthoodโ€™s hands are drenched in blood that all the free health care in the world canโ€™t wash away.

Theyโ€™re hopelessly guilty. Just like we are.

Apart from Christ, we are Planned Parenthood. We come before God with blood on our hands. Not the blood of millions of babies, but the blood of one child. Godโ€™s child. Jesus. We are responsible for His death. It was our sin that caused Him to be tortured to death. Our sin that brutally murdered Him.

We come before God with blood on our hands. Not the blood of millions of babies, but the blood of one child. Godโ€™s child. Jesus.

โ€œOh, but itโ€™s no big deal. Iโ€™m mainly a good person. The vast majority of my life is spent doing good things and helping people. That totally makes up for those few sins Iโ€™ve committed. My good deeds outweigh the bad.โ€

No. They donโ€™t. Good deeds can never make up for heinous crimes.

But, graceโ€ฆ But, mercyโ€ฆ But the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior intervenes and wipes away the guilt. Washes our hands of Christโ€™s blood. Cleanses us from all unrighteousness, if we only turn to Him in the repentance and faith that He is gracious enough to give us.

Good deeds can never make up for heinous crimes, but the grace of God can.

But when the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior appeared, he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that being justified by his grace we might become heirs according to the hope of eternal life.

Titus 3:4-7

Good deeds can never make up for heinous crimes, but the grace of God can.

Abortion, Christmas, Guest Posts

Guest Post: Mary’s “Unplanned” Pregnancy

If your theology pretty much matches up with mine (as outlined in my โ€œWelcomeโ€ and โ€œStatement of Faithโ€ tabs in the blue menu bar at the top of this page) and youโ€™d like to contribute a guest post, drop me an e-mail, and letโ€™s chat about it.

Mary’s “Unplanned” Pregnancy
by Charlotte Staudt

Have you ever heard Jesusโ€™s birth described as an โ€œunplannedโ€ or โ€œunexpected pregnancy”? Unfortunately, Iโ€™ve heard that description several times, and it seems to be gaining traction among some conservative Christians. I first heard it when I worked for a Christian public policy group, but Iโ€™ve also seen it on Focus on the Familyโ€™s website, a pregnancy care center, and even on a car magnet. During this Christmas season, you may come across this description yourself, so I would like to offer a few points as to why this description is wrong and why we canโ€™t use the Biblical account of Mary or any part of Luke 1 to form pro-life arguments.ย 

Unhelpful, Cultural Euphemisms 

In todayโ€™s culture, “unplanned” and “unexpected” are usually used as euphemisms for pregnancies resulting from illicit relationships. There are exceptions, of course, but for the most part, this is the case. Since those words are generally used to describe pregnancies resulting from sin, should we use them to describe Maryโ€™s pregnancy with Jesus, the Son of God, by the Holy Spirit? Of course not! Using such descriptions is unhelpful to say the least, and it is certainly disrespectful of Godโ€™s sovereignty. While such disrespect is probably not intentional, it simply isnโ€™t beneficial to use cultural euphemisms to describe a part of Godโ€™s perfect plan of redemption for His people, which had been planned since before the beginning of time. 

Ignoring Biblical Context

When reading the Bible, we know that context matters. As we begin a book of the Bible, itโ€™s important to ask and understand answers to some of the classic grade school questions of who, why, when, etc. For this point, Iโ€™d like to focus on Lukeโ€™s reason for writing, his โ€œwhy.โ€ He states this himself at the very beginning of his work: โ€œto write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, that you may have certainty concerning the things you have been taughtโ€ (Luke 1:3-4). In other words, Luke is simply writing a complete account for a brother in Christ. He wants Theophilus to have โ€œan orderly accountโ€ or a reliable record of the life of Jesus, and in this account, he starts at the beginning, first with the announcement of the coming of John the Baptist, and then the announcement of the coming of Jesus. 

While using cultural euphemisms was merely unhelpful, using Luke 1 to argue a pro-life position is eisegetical, the practice of eisegesis. Merriam-Webster defines eisegesis as, โ€œThe interpretation of a text (as of the Bible) by reading into it one’s own ideas.โ€ Costi Hinn expands on this idea, writing, โ€œEisegesis takes a specific passage from the Bible and isolates it from its original meaning, the authorโ€™s original intention, and Godโ€™s original purpose.โ€ Thus, when reading this account, or any Bible passage, we canโ€™t make the text say anything the original author didnโ€™t. As we read about Mary, we canโ€™t project our 21st-century ideas and emotions onto the text. That would be eisegesis. We canโ€™t cast Mary as a scared young woman facing an โ€œunplanned pregnancyโ€ and wondering what to do about it. There is no indication of that in the text. In fact, the text indicates quite the opposite. She was โ€œtroubledโ€ when the angel first appeared to her, but once she hears his message, she asks one question, and simply responds, โ€œBehold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your wordโ€ (Luke 1:38).

Additionally, some pro-lifers will also cite Luke 1:41, โ€œAnd when Elizabeth heard the greeting of Mary, the baby leaped in her womb,โ€ to argue their position. In fact, Roland Warren, president and CEO of the pro-life ministry Care Net, states the following, โ€œIf youโ€™re a pro-choice Christian, what this actually does in Scripture is it tells you that late-term abortion and early-term abortion are both killing a life.โ€ Does the Biblical text give any indication of any of this? No. Remember, this is an account, a record of the life of Jesus. Thus, John the Baptistโ€™s leap is simply an action, not a foundation for an argument. 

Missing the Biblical Lessons 

Since Luke 1:26-45 does not provide us with pro-life arguments, what does it teach us? What lessons can we glean from the text? First, everyone in this passage recognized Jesus as God. Gabriel tells Mary that Jesus โ€œwill be great and will be called the Son of the Most Highโ€ (Luke 1:32). In other words, Jesus was God. John MacArthur explains this by saying, โ€œto identify Jesus as the Son of the Most High is to declare that He has the same essence as the Most High God.โ€ He also states, โ€œGabrielโ€™s announcement also affirms the deity of Christ.โ€ According to Lukeโ€™s narrative, Mary asks no questions regarding this and simply takes the angel at his word. Elizabeth and an unborn John the Baptist also recognize Jesus as God. In verse 43, Elizabeth calls Mary, โ€œthe mother of my Lord,โ€ meaning she realized the baby Mary was carrying was the Son of God. Elizabethโ€™s explanation of John the Baptistโ€™s leap in verse 44 shows that he also recognized Jesus in Maryโ€™s womb. How would they both know this? Verse 41 tells us that โ€œElizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit.โ€ Thus, her understanding โ€œmust be attributed to the illuminating work of the Spirit,โ€ according to John MacArthur.1 Likewise, the response of John the Baptist was โ€œsupernaturally prompted by the Spirit of God.โ€2

The story of Mary also teaches us about trusting and submitting to God. Her reply, โ€œBehold, I am the servantof the Lord; let it be to me according to your word,โ€ shows complete submission to the will of God. John MacArthur uses โ€œwillinglyโ€ and โ€œgracefullyโ€ to describe her submission. R. C. Sproul refers to it as โ€œsubjection,โ€3 which Merriam-Webster defines as, โ€œone that is placed under authority or control.โ€ In other words, Mary not only recognized Godโ€™s authority over her, but she also trusted it. She didnโ€™t ask for a sign as Zechariah did (Luke 1:18), or doubt as many of us may struggle with from time to time. She understood Who God is and trusted Him because of it.  

In conclusion, as we read and ponder Luke 1 this Christmas, that reading shouldnโ€™t inspire us to pull verses out of context and argue our position. Rather, the accounts of Mary and Elizabeth should inspire us to glorify God for Who He is and what He has done. As we celebrate and enjoy the Christmas season, perhaps we would all do well to remember these words of R.C. Sproul, โ€œWe come at Christmastime, not to celebrate the birth of a baby. We come to celebrate the Incarnation of God.โ€  


1-2 MacArthur, John. โ€œLuke.โ€ In the John MacArthur Bible Commentary, 1274. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson. 

3 Sproul, R.C. โ€œThe Annunciation.โ€ In Luke: An Expositional Commentary, 22. Sanford, FL: Ligonier Ministries. ePub. 


Charlotte Staudt happily calls the South her home. On any given day, youโ€™ll most likely find her reading and researching, with her calico cat and a cup of tea close at hand. She doesnโ€™t have any social media to share, but she hopes you find her writing encouraging and helpful.