Mailbag

The Mailbag: How can the problems in the SBC (or any denomination/church) be fixed?

I read your article,ย Itโ€™s Time for a Reformation in the SBC โ€“ 3 Issues We Need to Set Right. In that article you only covered the issues needing correction, not the solutions. How would you suggest the Southern Baptist Convention, or any other church or denomination with similar problems, address those issues?

One of the reasons I addressed only the issues in that article is that a discussion of the issuesย and the solutions would have made the article extremely long. Another reason is that I know most of my readers are probably not Southern Baptist. Some of the solutions that first came to my mind would have been very “in house” to the SBC and would not have been of interest – nor made sense, without a lot of explanation (making the article even longer), of Southern Baptist polity – to those outside the SBC. However, the more I thought about the spiritual side of the issues, the more my perspective on the solutions changed. And addressing spiritual issues is relevant to every church and denomination.

As I mentioned in the previous article, the three most pressing issues I see facing the SBC are the sufficiency and authority of Scripture, false teachers/false doctrine, and disfellowshipping errant churches.

Because of the SBC’s commitment to the autonomy of the local church, I donโ€™t think any of these things are going to be corrected from the top down with resolutions and studies and committees and appointed/elected leaders. I can only speak from my own perspective, and others may disagree, but I donโ€™t see those things making any of these issues better, and in some cases theyโ€™re making things worse. I think turning the ship around is going to have to be a โ€œbottom upโ€ thing, starting at the church level.

So, what are some grassroots steps we can take?

โœขย Weโ€™re going to have to stop giving lip service to prayer and actually startย doing it. Individual prayer, yes, but what Iโ€™m really talking about is corporate prayer. Not โ€œorgan recitalsโ€, not Bible studies or worship services that we call โ€œprayer meetingsโ€, but actual, protracted corporate prayer meetings where we concentrate on praying for the spiritual health of our own church, other churches, and our denomination at large. The problems weโ€™re facing are, at their root, spiritual problems, and only God can change peopleโ€™s hearts. Itโ€™s high time we started crying out to Him to do so.

I know itโ€™s hard to get people to show up for actual prayer meetings. I used to be the Associational Prayer Coordinator for my local SBC association. Believe me, I get that itโ€™s like pulling teeth. Pastors are going to have to get as many of their teachers and leaders as possible on board and start by praying with them. Next, we need our pastors to spend some weeks and months training their people in how to pray, why we pray, what we pray for, the importance of prayer, and what the Bible says about prayer. And then weโ€™ll need pastors to proactively encourage people to be there. In my experience, corporate prayerย has to be pastor initiated and led. If itโ€™s delegated to a lay person or even an associate pastor, the rest of the church will see it as just one more optional program.

โœขย We have to emphasize the authority of Scripture over every aspect of church life. Is the church considering buying a new piece of property? Sending messengers to the annual meeting? Joining with another church in a particular endeavor? Planning a mission trip? Receiving a new member? Having a potluck? Whatever is going on in the life of the church, the very first thing that needs to be brought to the table at committee meetings, business meetings, even just casual discussions or brainstorming sessions, is an open Bible and the question, โ€œWhat does Scripture say about this?โ€ I think many times weโ€™re either assuming that most people already know what the Bible says about it, or weโ€™re doing what we think is best without consulting Godโ€™s Word, neither of which is healthy. We need to make sure weโ€™re doing what we do because the Bible says to do it, but approaching church decisions this way also trains individual members to think and act the same โ€œWhat does Scripture say about this?โ€ way in their own lives. That grows a healthier and more mature church body.

This helps drive home the concept of the sufficiency of Scripture, too. If your church is laser focused on โ€œWhat does the Bible say?โ€, itโ€™s going to biblically train your people how to find the answers they need for their own lives, and church life, in the Bible. Instead of โ€œGod told meโ€ extra-biblical revelation, instead of taking polls and surveys, sometimes even instead of forming a committee or having one more meeting, the Body will begin to depend on Godโ€™s Word as its sufficient source for making decisions.

โœขย Another way to emphasize the sufficiency of Scripture is to stop being so dependent on โ€œcannedโ€ Sunday School curricula and Bible study books, workbooks, DVDs etc., and simply teach straight from the Bible expositionally (itโ€™s cheaper too).

This scenario has played itself out in hundreds of SBC churches over the years: The womenโ€™s ministry committee gets together to decide what the next womenโ€™s Bible study will be. This author is suggested. That DVD series is suggested. Finally one brave soul pipes up and says, โ€œWhy donโ€™t we just study Ephesians?โ€. The looks on the other womenโ€™s faces demonstrate that studying straight from the Bible is a totally foreign concept.

My husband is a minister of music. He was on staff at a small church many years ago that was in a budget crunch. Something was going to have to be cut. I suggested cutting out Sunday School literature and just teaching the Bible. They opted instead to slash my husbandโ€™s salary (which was pretty paltry to begin with).

When weโ€™ve become so dependent on materials other than the Bible that church members have never heard of simply studying from the Bible or that the church would rather hurt one of its pastors than give up its literature, weโ€™ve become too dependent on outside resources and weโ€™re not viewing the Bible as sufficient.

โœขย If and when we do decide to use a curriculum or a study, weย must vet the study itself and the author(s). I know this is an unpopular thing to say among Southern Baptists, but I was asked for solutions, so Iโ€™m going to say it: LifeWay sells some materials authored by false teachers and some materials that contain false doctrine. You canโ€™t just assume that because LifeWay sells it, itโ€™s doctrinally sound. Get some discerning church members and put them to work reading the materials and comparing them to Scripture, and examining the fruit of the authorโ€™s life.

โœขย Weโ€™re going to have to be good Bereans and stop being so flippant and laissez-faire about false teachers and false doctrine. Eradicating false doctrine and false teachers from the house of God is a major theme of the Bible. If itโ€™s that serious to God, it should be that serious to us.

If somebody mentions that a certain Christian author, pastor, or teacher is a false teacher, donโ€™t mock, insult, and blow that person off as โ€œone of those crazy discernment people.โ€ We donโ€™t have to (and shouldnโ€™t) just blindly believe her, but we shouldnโ€™t just dismiss the allegation out of hand, either. Look into it. Do the research. Examine the evidence. Compare that teacherโ€™s life and teaching to rightly handled Scripture, and if she’s not walking blamelessly and teaching what accords with sound doctrine, stop allowing her and her materials into your church.

โœขย [Note:ย This part is more SBC-ish. Most other denominations have a process and governing body for dismissing errant churches. But because the SBC is technically not a denomination but a group of cooperating churches, the leadership of the SBC has very little ecclesiastical authority, including the authority to disfellowship churches.]ย As far as disfellowshipping errant churches goes, first, we need to make sure our church isnโ€™t one of them. We need our pastors to exposit the Word, not entertain. We need to make sure we equip our membership in rightly handling Godโ€™s Word, prayer, evangelism, worship, and caring for one another. We need to make sure our church is biblically healthy.

Next, get involved with the local association and, whatever the procedure is, formulate a set of criteria for disfellowshipping errant churches, employ it when necessary, and pursue it to the state and national convention levels when possible. There are a variety of doctrinal issues that could be included (A couple I would suggest: disfellowshipping churches that violate tenets of the Baptist Faith and Message 2000 and/or teach any of the historic heresies {Arianism, Modalism, etc.}), but as I mentioned in the above linked article thereโ€™s got to be a higher standard than just giving money and being on the right side of homosexuality. We should be holding up the highest standards of biblical doctrine for churches who want the right to be called Southern Baptist, not minimizing and reducing our requirements to the least common denominator.

Pray long and pray hard. Build spiritually healthy and mature churches and church members. Get them involved at the associational and state convention level. Then send them to represent your church at the annual meeting. If God is pleased to change hearts, and if we get enough healthy churches and church members working together, thatโ€™s what will bring change at the national level.


If you have a question about: a Bible passage, an aspect of theology, a current issue in Christianity, or how to biblically handle a family, life, or church situation, comment below (Iโ€™ll hold all questions in queue {unpublished} for a future edition ofย The Mailbag) or send me anย e-mail or private message. If your question is chosen for publication, your anonymity will be protected.


Discover more from Michelle Lesley

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “The Mailbag: How can the problems in the SBC (or any denomination/church) be fixed?”

  1. Great article.

    I am a reader ! Throughout my studies, I have read a lot about the importance of doctrine. But what are considered primary doctrines and secondary doctrines? Depending on the authors, one may think a doctrine is a primary doctrine while others think itโ€™s a secondary doctrine. Isnโ€™t doctrine just doctrine?

    Like

    1. This is an excellent question, Patricia, and I may address it more fully in a future edition of The Mailbag. When we talk about primary, secondary, and tertiary doctrines, we’re not saying secondary and tertiary doctrines aren’t important. It’s just a way of separating out which doctrines are salvific, and which are not. Primary doctrines are the ones that, if you get them wrong, you’re not saved. For example: the deity of Christ or His bodily resurrection. If you don’t believe Christ was God, you are not a Christian. If you don’t believe He was physically resurrected, you aren’t a Christian.

      Secondary and tertiary doctrines are still very important, but people can hold different beliefs on these things and still be Christians. For example: credo baptism (baptizing only people who are capable of making a public profession of faith, “Believer’s baptism) versus paedo baptism (covenant baptism of babies) or eschatology (the order and mode of events surrounding Christ’s second coming).

      Although I would disagree with him about female “pastors” being a secondary doctrine (I would put it in the category of sin, just like lying, coveting, or murder, and I would also say that if you have a female “pastor”, you don’t have a pastor, so you don’t have a church.), this article from Al Mohler is a very good explanation on the different tiers of doctrine.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Unfortunately, until the church takes seriously 1 John 3:14,Revelation 12:17 and 14:12, nothing will change. Broach a teacher/preacher about the commands of God and you will be invited to leave the premises (or theology school).

    Like

Before commenting please see the "Welcome" tab in the blue menu bar at the top of this page. Comments are handled manually, so there will be a delay before approved comments are posted. I do not publish comments which promote false doctrine.