Beth Moore – Page 5 – Michelle Lesley

A few days ago, I had the pleasure of sitting down and chatting with Andrew Rappaport on the The Rapp Report podcast, a ministry of Striving for Eternity. Listen in as Andrew and I discuss the Open Letter to Beth Moore*, complementarianism and more!

Be sure to subscribe to the The Rapp Report podcast, and don’t forget to follow Striving for Eternity on Facebook and Twitter!

*Ladies, if you’d like to add your signature to the letter, click on the link above, scroll all the way to the bottom, and add a comment in the comment box. (You will not see your signature immediately since I approve comments manually.)

Got a podcast of your own or have a podcasting friend who needs a guest? Need a speaker for a women’s conference or church event? Click the “Speaking Engagements” tab at the top of this page, drop me an e-mail, and let’s chat!

Mailbag

The Mailbag: Questions about the Open Letter to Beth Moore

June 24, 2019June 18, 2024 Michelle Lesley

Since the publication of the Open Letter to Beth Moore, several questions have arisen that I’d like to address in today’s edition of The Mailbag.

(Ladies who would like to add your signature to the letter- click the link above, scroll all the way down, and add a comment in the comment box. Your comment will not appear immediately, since I manually approve comments.) (You are welcome to leave a comment, but I am no longer adding signatures to the letter.)

If you’re not familiar with the context of this article, please read An Open Letter to Beth Moore – Timeline of Events.

1. Michelle, why did you write the letter?
I didn’t (long-time readers can probably tell from the format and phraseology), and it was not my idea. I was asked to give input on the letter, be one of the original signers, and help publicize the letter, and I agreed to do so. Most of the original signers have also posted the letter at their websites.

2. What is the purpose of the letter?
The purpose of the letter should be self-evident if read carefully in its entirety. It is to learn Beth Moore’s position on homosexuality in light of the fact that she has been virtually silent on this issue.

3. Why is Beth Moore’s position on homosexuality any of your business?
Ironically, the people who have asked this question consider it their business to know why it is our business.

First of all, let’s clarify something. This is not a personal question like, “Boxers or briefs?” or “How’s your relationship with your husband?”. Those are questions that can rightly be answered with, “None of your business.” The questions we have asked are more akin to asking a politician, “What is your position on the First Amendment?” If someone asked a politician that question in a public setting, we would find it very odd if he did not answer and his supporters told the questioner it was none of her business.

Beth Moore has said repeatedly that she has been a Bible teacher for forty years. Asking a Bible teacher questions about what she believes about the Bible is perfectly reasonable, especially when that Bible teacher has decades of experience, is an evangelical celebrity, and publicly shares what she believes about the Bible on various topics every day on Twitter. Asking what Beth believes about homosexuality is a legitimate biblical question that cannot be credibly answered with, “None of your business.”

One of the reasons I personally believe it is very much my business is not mentioned in the letter. (Again, I did not write it, though I do not fault the author for omitting this point.) It is my business and that of every single one of the 14.8 million other Southern Baptists out there.

Largely because the world has made homosexuality the litmus test of “Are you for us or against us?” the Southern Baptist Convention has, not unwisely, also made it a litmus test (see Article III.1.1) for whether or not churches can be in cooperation with the SBC and whether or not LifeWay will carry an author’s materials (we’ve seen this with Jen Hatmaker, Eugene Peterson, etc.).

Beth Moore is the best known Southern Baptist in the world, hands down. I have no doubt that she influences more Christians than the president of the SBC, the heads of all SBC entities, and all SBC pastors. If the SBC is going to make homosexuality the iconic issue on which we judge churches and authors, why should Beth, as LifeWay’s best selling author, and the best known and most influential Southern Baptist in the world not have to make it clear where she stands on homosexuality? If any Southern Baptist should have to clearly and publicly declare where she stands on the issue of homosexuality, it’s Beth. I mean, if any Southern Baptist church member walked into her pastor’s office and asked him these questions and he equivocated, refused to answer, or couldn’t biblically answer them, he would be flirting with violating the SBC requirement that churches hold a biblical stance on homosexuality or face being disfellowshipped. But Beth Moore doesn’t have to answer? No, she owes it to every Southern Baptist to clearly state where she stands on this issue – especially to LifeWay and to the women and churches who use her materials.

But, as original signer of the letter, Elizabeth Prata, asks, “Does the SBC and Lifeway apply a double standard to Beth Moore?“

But Beth also owes it to her followers to make it clear where she stands on this important biblical issue. I’m surmising – from the comments of several people who have defended her – that some of her followers are practicing homosexuals or are affirming of homosexuality. If she is a Bible teacher, it is her obligation (whether she answers the letter directly to us or not) not to “shrink from declaring to [them] the whole counsel of God” (Acts 20:27), which includes the Bible’s teaching on this currently ubiquitous issue. Certainly, any Christian must broach this issue lovingly and compassionately, but it must be broached, and broached clearly, firmly, and unashamedly. It is not loving to neglect or decline to call sinners to repentance for fear of hurting their feelings when those people could die in their sins and spend an eternity in Hell. Beth has a large platform and could bring biblical clarity to this issue to her many followers. We are prayerfully hoping she chooses to steward her platform to the glory of God by helping those in her sphere of influence to understand the Bible’s clear teaching on homosexuality.

4. Beth is under no obligation to answer this letter.
Of course she’s not, and no one ever said she was. She does not answer to me, personally, or any of the other signers of the letter. We have also not “demanded” as some have put it, that she respond to the letter. We have merely asked a few simple questions. Speaking for myself, it is immaterial to me whether or not she ever directly responds to me and the other signers of this letter. But as I mentioned above in #3, she is under obligation to Southern Baptists and to her followers to make her position on homosexuality known and clear. The venue or method she chooses for doing so (i.e. a direct response to the letter, writing a Bible study on homosexuality, a letter to Southern Baptist leadership explaining her position, etc.) is unimportant.

5. Why didn’t you contact Beth privately as Matthew 18:15-20 says to do?
The Matthew 18 passage on church discipline does not apply in the case of public discourse in the public square or to asking a Bible teacher questions about the Bible. It is about sin in the local congregation where you actually know the offender personally and have access to him/her. It has to do with correcting sin in the local church and removing the offender from the local church if she refuses to repent. Jesus, Paul, and others addressed public teaching and other issues publicly many times without following the (again, inapplicable) steps in Matthew 18. D.A. Carson, Josh Buice, and Randy Alcorn have each written excellent articles further explaining the inapplicability of this passage to public teaching. The only way to apply the Matthew 18 passage on church discipline in this situation would be if Beth’s own church and pastor applied it to her.

Furthermore, even though the Matthew 18 passage does not apply to asking someone questions or teaching in the public square, many people (including me) have tried to contact Beth privately on numerous occasions only to have their e-mails ignored. One of the ladies who added her signature to the letter mentioned that she has known Beth personally since the days when she was in Beth’s aerobics class (before Beth became a Bible teacher) and has tried several times to contact her about concerns over her teachings, and even her e-mails have gone unanswered.

6. I don’t think the “open letter” format is the appropriate venue for addressing issues like this.
I’m not crazy about open letters myself, but consider the following:

1. As I mentioned in #5 above, even though this is not a Matthew 18 issue, many have tried to contact Beth privately numerous times about various issues and have been ignored, including at least one woman who has known Beth personally for decades. There is no reason to expect that she would respond to this issue in private correspondence.

2. Southern Baptist and/or LifeWay leadership has either not held her publicly accountable on this issue or she has refused to be held accountable by them.

3. Beth has not answered public social media questions about this issue.

4. Beth has not spontaneously/voluntarily made her position on this issue clear.

Since none of these venues have been effective, and some feel the open letter format is inappropriate, what is the appropriate venue?

Original signer of the letter, Elizabeth Prata, has more to add here concerning Beth’s availability to be contacted.

I would also remind those objecting to the open letter format that Beth herself wrote an open letter on her own blog about a year ago. It’s still on her LPM blog and is titled “A Letter to My Brothers” if you’d like to read it. It would be inconsistent to object to our use of the open letter format without also objecting to Beth’s use of the open letter format.

7. If Beth makes an unequivocally clear biblical statement on homosexuality, does that mean she is a doctrinally sound Bible teacher?
No. If Beth makes an unequivocally clear biblical statement on homosexuality, we would rejoice that God’s Word has been rightly proclaimed on that issue to all who hear or read it, and we would offer our thanks and encouragement to Beth for doing so. It would be a wonderful, courageous step in a godly direction for Beth’s theology.

We hope that wonderful step would be her first step down the road of submitting to and teaching sound biblical doctrine in three other major problematic areas of Beth’s theology which render her doctrinally unsound: mishandling God’s Word, preaching to men, and partnering with false teachers.

8. So what if Beth is friends with Jonathan Merritt and Jen Hatmaker? People can be friends with people they disagree with.
Of course people can be friends with people they disagree with. That’s not the question. The question is – does Beth actually disagree with them? She hasn’t said so. And if she does disagree with them, why has she not made this clear to her followers? When someone is a public figure and Bible teacher she has to be very careful and circumspect about her associations and the example she sets. Beth’s followers look up to her and consider her their teacher. When public adulatory interactions take place between Beth and those who have clearly affirmed homosexuality (especially when Beth has been virtually silent on this issue), many of her followers will take that as a tacit agreement (or at least not disagreement) with their theology.

9. Who is Martha Pearce?
It’s not Martha PeaRce, who was one of the original signers of the letter, it’s Martha Peace. Like “peace on earth.” Martha Peace is well known in doctrinally sound women’s ministry and biblical counseling circles. I believe a few articles and/or broadcasts may have spelled or pronounced her name incorrectly. It’s my hope that journalists, interviewers, etc., will make sure they have her name correct since the fact that she signed the letter will be impactful to many women.

10. Has Beth responded the letter or the questions yet? Do you anticipate that she will?
As of this time, no, Beth has not responded to the letter or the questions yet in any meaningful way.

She posted a cryptically vague Facebook post warning her followers about “Bible beaters void of the Holy Spirit” roughly coinciding with the release of the letter, but while this may have been a visceral reaction to the letter, I personally (I believe some of the other original signers may have differing opinions), do not consider it a response, or answer, to the letter. It did not mention or even allude to the letter, any of us who signed the letter, anyone or anything mentioned in the letter, or the topic of homosexuality.

Beth also posted this tweet thread, which may seem to sort of answer the letter, but actually does not. A couple of excerpts from the thread:

Let’s review the questions from the letter:

1. Do you believe homosexuality is inherently sinful?

2. Do you believe that the practice of the homosexual lifestyle is compatible with holy Christian living?

3. Do you believe a person who dies as a practicing homosexual but professes to be a Christian will inherit eternal life?

4. Do you believe same sex attraction is, in and of itself, an inherently sinful, unnatural, and disordered desire that must be mortified?

5. Why have you been so silent on this subject in light of your desire to “teach the word of God?”

There is nothing anywhere in the questions or the letter addressing who Jesus “didn’t love,” “did not give His life for,” or “would’ve refused to be seen with.”

There is not even a hint of a suggestion in the questions or the letter that she, or anyone else, should “shun” anyone.

Assuming this tweet is responding to the letter (we have to assume because she doesn’t say one way or the other and, again, she never mentions homosexuality in this thread), this is a passive aggressive ad hominem dig at the signers of the letter.

Why would I ask Beth to clarify her tweet (which she has yet to respond to)? Well, for starters, you’ll notice she intentionally chose a verse that does not use any form of the word “homosexuality,” even though she is undoubtedly familiar with the ones that do. Why? Why not use 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (also written by Paul) which uses the more specific term?

For those of us who are familiar with Galatians 5:19 and the Greek behind it, we already know that “sexual immorality” covers all sexual activity outside the monogamous heterosexual marriage bed, which does include homosexuality. Therefore, many of Beth’s followers from a conservative church background will take her quotation of this passage in Galatians 5 to mean, “Yes, I agree with the Bible that homosexuality is a sin.”

However, as I pointed out earlier, Beth also has homosexual and homosexual affirming followers, many of whom likely subscribe to the “gay Christian” movement’s ideology that the verses in the Bible that condemn homosexuality are only speaking of homosexual temple prostitution and assorted other perversions, not loving, faithful, monogamous homosexual “marriages” or relationships. Additionally, as the letter cited, Beth’s friend Jen Hatmaker has made it abundantly clear that she believes homosexual unions can be “holy” and that unrepentant, practicing homosexuals can be Christians, which Beth has never publicly refuted. Beth’s adulatory friendship with Jen and Jonathan are likely seen by many of her homosexual/homosexual affirming followers as a tacit endorsement of their errant theology. People who believe all of these errant ideas about homosexuality are not going to to see the term “sexual immorality” as applying to faithful homosexual relationships (How could a relationship be “holy” and “immoral” at the same time?), so they will see Beth’s tweet as saying that she considers “sexual immorality” a sin, but not that that term includes “moral” homosexual relationships.

So we’re basically right back where we started. This tweet is not an answer, and it doesn’t clarify her position on homosexuality. It is an obfuscation in an attempt to deflect any further questioning of her position on the issue.

Personally, and I believe most of the other original signers would agree, I do not anticipate that Beth will respond directly to the letter or clearly answer the questions. As I stated earlier, it seems to be her practice to ignore e-mails and social media comments that request biblical accountability from her, and I don’t see why our letter would be treated any differently.

11. You’re just trying to get attention, make a name for yourself, or build up your own ministry by publishing this letter.

DebbieLynne Kespert, one of the original signers of the letter helpfully answers this false accusation in her article Did I Publish The Open Letter To Beth Moore In Order To Get People To Read The Outspoken TULIP?

The question we should all be asking ourselves is – why? Why is Beth afraid to answer these very simple questions that she knows the answers to? Why has she avoided answering them for five days? Why, when she finally “responded,” did she give such an evasive answer instead of clearly stating her position on homosexuality as she has on many other issues? If you took these questions to your pastor or Bible study teacher at church and he responded to them the way Beth Moore responded, what would you think?

Whether Beth chooses to answer our letter directly or not, it is our prayer (and we are praying for her) that she will boldly and unashamedly take a clear biblical stand on the issue of homosexuality in order to help her followers better understand the truth of God’s Word – that sinners may be saved, that saints may be properly discipled, and that God may receive all the glory.

If you have a question about: a Bible passage, an aspect of theology, a current issue in Christianity, or how to biblically handle a family, life, or church situation, comment below (I’ll hold all questions in queue {unpublished} for a future edition of The Mailbag) or send me an e-mail or private message. If your question is chosen for publication, your anonymity will be protected.

Homosexuality

An Open Letter to Beth Moore

June 19, 2019June 18, 2024 Michelle Lesley

We have answered some of the most commonly asked
questions about the Open Letter to Beth Moore here.

If you are unfamiliar with the events surrounding this letter, please read
An Open Letter to Beth Moore – Timeline of Events.

Dear Mrs. Moore,

Hello – we hope this finds you doing well.

We as female Bible teachers ourselves write this letter to you in hopes of receiving clarification of your views on an important issue: homosexuality.

In the last few years, particularly since 2016, you have been very vocal in your opposition to misogyny and racism. Anytime a story with so much of a whiff of these issues comes to the forefront you are very quick to speak out. The actions of the Covington kids, for example, you said “is so utterly antichrist it reeks of the vomit of hell” in a January 19, 2019 tweet; a tweet you deleted, without apology to the kids, once the full video was shown that portrayed a very different reality than what initial reporting suggested.

It is this Johnny-on-the-spot readiness to engage issues related to misogyny and racism that makes your virtual silence on the issue of homosexuality so puzzling.

To your credit, in your book To Live is Christ: The Life and Ministry of Paul, you wrote, “I met a young man who had experienced freedom from the bondage of homosexuality” (pg. 119). This book was first published in 1997 and then republished in 2008 but it seems since then you have said very little if anything publicly about this issue.

Another factor prompting our open letter to you is the very public mutual affection and admiration between you, Jen Hatmaker and Jonathan Merritt.

Jen Hatmaker and you regularly exchange affirming posts of one another on social media. In just one recent example, Hatmaker on September 17, 2018 wrote “Beth Moore will enjoy my respect and devotion forever. She is worthy of being a mentor to an entire generation. And friends, I wish you knew how deeply and profoundly she has loved me these last two years” (Source). In an interview two years before this post, October of 2016, Jen Hatmaker said she was a “left-leaning moderate,” came out as fully supportive of homosexual marriage (saying it can be “holy”) and said practicing homosexuals can be part of the regenerate body of Christ (Source). It was then that LifeWay decided to pull all of her books from its shelves.

More recently, on April 9, 2019, Jonathan Merritt tweeted, “I no longer believe @BethMooreLPM is a human. I think she is an angelic being having a human experience.” (Source). Jonathan Merritt has admitted to having at least one homosexual encounter about a decade ago (Source). Today, by his own admission he rejects biblical inerrancy, says a “liberal Protestant” would be an accurate description of him, and says his sexual orientation he no longer views as “broken” (Source). In a crass response to Dr. Owen Strachan tweeting, rightly so, that there should never be an occasion in which men “cuddle” with one another, Merritt on May 1, 2019 tweeted in response, “C’mon, Owen. You can be my little spoon” (Source). Merritt also openly affirms that “queer” and LGBTQ people are included in God’s Kingdom and it is a “carrot of false promises” that the Gospel can make such people straight (Source, Source). He supports “Drag Queen Story Time” in which drag queens read stories to young children in public libraries (Source 27:40 mark). He even appears to doubt the exclusivity of Christ (Source).

Both Jen Hatmaker and Jonathan Merritt are known for their belief that practicing homosexuals can be Christians. Given that this is such a deeply held conviction that both share and this conviction (wrong though it is) has cost them both in their standing amongst theologically conservative evangelicals, and that they both praise you so highly, it raises the natural question as to where you stand on this issue.

Given his beliefs, Merritt publicly saying that he believes you to be “an angelic being having a human experience” strongly suggests that his high praise of you is, at least partially, rooted in your views on this issue that you have shared with him privately. It seems most unlikely that he would be praising you so highly if you had told him that as a homosexual man he will perish for all of eternity unless he repents. It likewise seems unlikely that Hatmaker (a married, straight woman) would praise you so highly if you told her that her affirmation of homosexuality and homosexual marriage is sinful and that she must repent.

When all of this is coupled with your total silence on homosexuality (in stark contrast to your very vocal stance on gender/racial/abuse issues) it naturally raises the question as to what your beliefs on it truly are.

With these factors in mind, and knowing that millions of people follow your teachings, we would like to ask you:

1. Do you believe homosexuality is inherently sinful?

2. Do you believe that the practice of the homosexual lifestyle is compatible with holy Christian living?

3. Do you believe a person who dies as a practicing homosexual but professes to be a Christian will inherit eternal life?

4. Do you believe same sex attraction is, in and of itself, an inherently sinful, unnatural, and disordered desire that must be mortified?

5. Why have you been so silent on this subject in light of your desire to “teach the word of God?”

We ask these questions to you out of genuine concern. As Bible teachers, all of us are held to a very high standard and will give an account for how we handle God’s word. As you know, homosexuality is widely discussed and debated amongst evangelicals and society at large.

Many families are affected by this issue. The most loving thing obedient Christians can do for them is to clearly communicate God’s truth. We look forward to your clarification on these pressing issues. Thank you.

Kind regards,

Susan Heck
With the Master

Debbie Lynne Kespert
The Outspoken Tulip

Michelle Lesley
Michelle Lesley- Discipleship for Christian Women
A Word Fitly Spoken Podcast

Martha Peace
Martha Peace

Elizabeth Prata
The End Time

Amy Spreeman
Berean Research
Naomi’s Table
A Word Fitly Spoken Podcast

Readers, if you would like to add your signature to this open letter, please comment below. (My regular comment parameters still apply.
Please read before commenting.)
Supportive comments will be considered signatures.

I will no longer be adding signatures to this list,
but please feel free to comment.

1. Debbie Gartland 2. Sherri Brazeal 3. Theresa Miller 4. Cheryl Thompson

5. Jamie Gladden 6. MrsHLBjr 7. Sue Layman 8. Dottie Gephart

9. Laura Moses 10. Cynthia Sutton 11. Kristy Kapp 12. Andrea Crawford

13. Gina 14. Kimberly 15. Sarah Deringer 16. Laura Esther

17. Julie Waschuk 18. Britt Smith 19. Sybil Hemingway 20. Alma Moss

21. Nancy Brown 22. McKenzie Pope Moffett 23. Barbara Phillips

24. Anna Wood 25. Tami Recke 26. Amy Mabe 27. Jacy Harrison

28. Deena647 29. Kara Peters 30. Steph Johnson

31. Cristy Ann Bestwick 32. Jessica Laird 33. Lydia Hamre

34. Pat Seitz 35. Cindy Duncan-Shaw 36. Cathy Wentzel

37. Linda Rios 38. Kelley Andrich 39. Kelly Jo 40. Katie Smith

41. Amanda Ridenour 42. Melissa Leigh Morris 43. Erika Morris

44. Pam 45. Ann Blaskovich 46. Molly Hoverson 47. Linda Culp Collier

48. Heather Brownlie McCuaig 49. Ginger Weincek 50. Shelley Brown

51. Lauren Hereford 52. Miyoshig 53. Jeri Lowe-Howell 54. Angela

55. Kelly Cason 56. Kris Turrentine 57. Lisa Carey 58. Darlene Doss

60. Annie Monserrate 61. Cheryl R Lamz 62. Maribel C Ibrahim

63. sgoetz78 64. Caitlin Wickliffe 65. Regina Hagan 66. Anne R.

67. Julie Harrod 68. Katie Jay 69. Dawn Staton 70. Susan

71. Jennifer Buck 72. Amy Andrews 73. Stephanie Madrigal 74. triplejaymom

75. Cindy LaFreniere 76. Sharon Cole 77. Julie Fugate 78. Kathy Peters

79. Mrs. Lisor 80. Robin Sykee 81. Lisa King 82. Susan 83. Lisa Brown

84. Eileen Smith 85. Karen McMahon 86. Cathy Kaech 87. Carie Stephens

88. Kim Chapman 89. Cheryl Toepfer 90. Nancy Madrick 91. Linda Sullivan

92. Brittany Hunt 93. Anne Mai 94. Maureen Kopper 95. Julie Norton

96. Debbie Fleig 97. Hilary Osborne 98. Maggie Hebert 99. Leigh Melniszyn

100. Erin Coughlin 101. Laurel Pinske 102. Alicia Bowman 103. Jori Groen

104. Laura Gutwein 105. Nicole B. Guillory 106. Lisa Mifflin

107. Kristine Stone 108. Carol Anne 109. Rachel Lipski 110. Laura Smith

111. jacor13 112. Traci Danker 113. Christina Pountney

114. Elizabeth Jackson 115. Marita Tibbetts 116. Amy Ramey

117. Maygen Wilson 118. Mary Bradley-Carlson 119. Allison Smith

120. Sandra 121. Courtney Sharp 122. Barb Prihoda 123. Penny Humphreys

124. Jan Bennett 125. Ren Moody 126. Trish Hisle 127. Heidi Moody

128. Carey Hurlburt 129. Kate Skogstad 130. Suzanne Lukawski

131. Elizabeth Beales 132. Susan Tesauro 133. Carol Koprowski

134. Christine Pack 135. Susan Stribich 136. Becka Goings

137. Pamela Thomas 138. Deborah Hunter 139. Mo Weaver

140. Kim Roberts 141. Corrie Dove 142. Lauren Holladay

143. Patty Roberts 144. Beth Stark 145. Sarah Crow 146. Sofia Shapleigh

147. Carnata Horton 148. Dulce Rodejo 149. Heather Fernandez

150. Carolyn Sevier 151. Christine Dullea 152. Amanda Gardiner

153. Char Hartman 154. Susan Haymon 155. Audra Huntet 156. Karla Nunez

157. Debra Pendergraft 158. Debbie 159. Leah P. 160. Sissel Salayda

161. Stephanie Yearwood 162. Melissa Harrison 163. tamtam0101

164. Anita Meisen 165. Elizabeth Moyle 166. Karen Gregory

167. Kate Thompson 168. Shannon Choate 169. Carol Berubee

170. Michele Harden 171. Lisa Snyder 172. Camille Warren

173. Diane Wenning 174. Nancy Nuzzolo 175. Kylee Chavers

176. Lynda Foster 177. Patricia Sanford 178. Jessica Lam

179. Brooke Anglin 180. Heidi Pearce 181. Michele Archambault

182. Michele Lewis 183. Pat Guldenpfennig 184. Angela Asano

185. Sue Cryderman 186. Jacqueline Cody 187. Theresia Smith

188. Peggy Summers 189. Lora M Carver 190. Regina Bean

191. Camille Patterson 192. Kate Butler 193. Leisa Minear

194. Ellie Mae Stankus 195. Tina Nix 196. Linda Currans

197. Daniela Ledwick 198. Melissa Flowers 199. flippingtheswitch

200. Vicky Jackson 201. Cherice Graham 202. Lora Burdette

203. Linda Hughes 204. Heather Ells 205. Jessica Harris

206. Kim von olhausen 207. Cynthia Garcia 208. Norleen Gardner Cheser

209. C. G. Jackson 210. Liz Avrit 211. Charlotte Irons Augustine

212. Tammera Scrivner 213. Donna Nelson 214. Susan Johnson

215. Qiana S. Shaw 216. Donna Dabbs 217. deuteronomysix5to9

218. Tiet Parsons 219. Marline Coronado 220. Julie Wyatt 221. Shelly Howard

222. Janice Porter Huertas 223. Lea K. Housley 224. Bonnie Secrest

225. Julie McKenzie 226. Terri Weiford 227. Pamela Melland

228. Diane E Ellison 229. Cherice Graham 230. Becky U

231. ruthsreminiscings 232. Darlene Tan 233. Kim Starling 234. Candy Macy

235. Rebecca Walls 236. Amy Scott 237. lynettestalls4146

238. Jammie Burwell 239. psfair 240. Laura Flack 241. Kayleigh H.

242. Cel Sherer 243. Kristy Jackson 244. Autumn Lisor 245. Julie Matteson

246. Keri Drescher 247. Name later removed for online anonymity 248. Hayley Wiley 249. Grace Pimm

250. Melanie Carrel 251. Lora Schmitz 252. Julie Wood 253. lauranlou

254. Pamela Collier 255. Coleen Thomas 256. Linda Hughes 257. Becky Bizzell

258. Debbie Lund 259. Connie Gilliam 260. Brandy Hurley

261. Linda Sola Gratia 262. Emily Kelly 263. Gracia 264. Sandie Fields

265. Erika Luft 266. Jennifer Sanders 267. Esther Wood 268. Trina Armstrong

269. tburks0123 270. Cathy Stein 271. Angela Fletcher 272. bjhcfr

273. Abby Adams 274. Diana 275. Cindy Price 276. Karen Buttle

277. Beth Seifert 278. Gemma Gregory 279. Julie Six 280. Colleen Ridge

281. Brenda Klockenga 282. Mary Bausano 283. Heather Thompson

284. Deana Klarich 285. Cheri Briere 286. Frankie Peterson

287. Charlotte Warren 288. Daphne Self 289. Billie J Freeman 290. Tara Hiley

291. Lou Ann Platt 292. I. N. Carpenter 293. Rachel Capps 294. Emily Tucker

295. Elena C. Parr 296. Julie Martin 297. lex122083 298. RM Vicary

299. Tania Carr 300. Sonia Correa 301. Wanda Poudrette 302. Lisa Israel

303. Kelly Gilmore 304. Melissa Ice 305. Michele Smith 306. Natalie Zeiler

307. Sonia Shoultz 308. MJ 309. Kandi Veazey 310. Haley Phillips

311. Kim Francia 312. Janexsy Zayas 313. Debra Hausmann

314. Patricia Finch 315. Bethany 316. Ashley Wyly 317. Amanda Smith

318. Wendy Robinson 319. Lara Roberts 320. Robin Hayes

321. Maggie Pearson 322. Slone Chapman 323. Dawn Antczak

324. Loretta Pardo 325. Autumn Beck 326. Casey Hylton

327. Sonya McGowan 328. Elaine Harman 329. Melissa Googe

330. Leisa Minear 331. Starr Bowlin 332. Jamie Niederkohr

333. Andrea Thomas 334. Tennille Betker 335. Debbie Nateghi

336. Cindy Price 337. Linda Brown 338. Rhonda Gomez 339. Liz James

340. Laura Burton 341. Jamie Dollinger 342. Christie Ann Algeo

343. Kerri Wagner 344. Amy Wood 345. Amy Hall 346. Beth Malarkey

347. Jo Vazquez 348. Cindy Mock 349. Christine Combs 350. Catherine- BBF

351. Kim- BBF 352. Vicki- BBF 353. Tina- BBF 354. Tara- BBF

355. Cate- BBF 356. Patti- BBF 356. Anonymous- BBF 357. Pamela Couvrette

358. Doris Sparks 359. Deborah Hallman 360. Cyndy Adeniyi

361. Laurie Ingram 362. Susan 363. Kay Cude 364. Melanie Lockhart

365. Leah Johnson 366. Jeni Myers 367. Keri Stankova 368. Tanya Herring

369. B Logue 370. Charlotte Sutton 371. ameliavk 372. Jannelle Kodad

373. Debbie Nateghi 374. Lynette 375. Heaven Henderson 376. Jennifer Rice

377. Michelle David 378. Karen Butterfield 379. Sheila H. Bragg

380. Angela Wismer 381. Karen Short 382. Pamela Ellenburg

383. Danielle Ware 384. Emily George 385. April Chapman 386. Gayle Smith

387. Liz Maria 388. Kris Schlagel 389. Amanda Simkins 390. Julie Garber

391. Hope Green 392. Nicole Mitchell 393. Rachelle Journey

394. Chrissy Reimer 395. Margaret Gunden 396. Maureen Payne

397. Rebecca Barner 398. Melissa Armstrong 399. Holly Major 400. Lisa PS

401. Linda Rice 402. Nancy Carrera 403. Katy Alderton 404. Christine Frost

405. Renee J. Bailey 406. Amberly Wieler 407. Susan K 408. Katie Purvis

409. Valerie Ward 410. Alise Grant 411. mvfreeman 412. Jo Rodgers

413. Mitzi Turpin 414. Tina Liouzis 415. Marsha West 416. Christine Parfitt

417. Leslie J. Witty 418. Victoria Nelson 419. Leah Stewart

420. Nancy Carrera 421. Lydia Harris 422. karolewithak 423. Diane Conklin

424. Tammy Monson 425. Katie Quintana 426. Diane Kelley 427. Carole Kaetz

428. Jessica Oathoudt 429. Valerie Muirhead 430. Lisa Schmidt

431. Kim Schwart 432. Raynie Sivillo 433. Lisa Ente 434. Tina Dewey

435. Amy. Rozycki 436. Jennifer Christensen 437. Christa Reynolds

439. Kathy Freeman 440. Traci Gardner 441. Debbie Landers 442. caligurrl61

443. Melissa McIntyre 444. Kim 445. Valerie Hupp 446. Sharon Buss

447. Kira Ulmer 448. Brittany Bieghler 449. Nicole Bibelheimer McAbee

450. Sandy Bitter 451. Monica Turner 452. Elizabeth Emerson

453. Kara Emerson 454. Janice Krieger 455. Peggy M. Miller

456. Cecelia Matchett 457. Wendi Peterson 458. LeDawn Kosek

459. Dianne Larios 460. Rhonda Owens 461. Kathleen Lanteigne

462. Terra Hicks 463. Brenda Block 464. Lisa Ente 465. Sarah Elizabeth

466. Darlene Diaz 467. Debra Wiest 468. Lyndsey Fromme 469. Laurie Tietjen

470. Connie Windham 471. Gladys Martínez 472. Beth Cavete 473. Linda Bell

474. Beth Finkbeiner 475. Heather Rollins 476. Charla Counts Tatom

477. Ose Burnett 478. Kathy Firth 479. Debbie Bergt 480. J Chen

481. Melissa Duerksen 482. Kate Hendrickson 483. Miranda Abugharbeya

484. Gisele Krippner 485. Robin Kelley 486. Kari 487. Maggie Gunden

488. Mollie Moore 489. Diana Johnson 490. Stacy Brooks 491. Gina Shaw

492. Kellie Watson 493. Bonnie Schwartz 494. Kay Davis 495. Lisa

496. Rosilind Jukic 497. Laura Kelly 498. Sandy Artus 499. Clare McNaul

500. Tami 501. Diane Ostrow 502. Amanda Ladefoged 503. Bev Azure

504. Hayley Bevier 505. Mary L. Briere 506. Rommy Miller 507. Tammy Derryberry

508. Billie Freeman 509. Amy Knight

Podcast Appearances

Voice of Reason Radio Podcast Guest Appearance

May 24, 2019May 23, 2019 Michelle Lesley

It was such a pleasure to be a recent guest on the Voice of Reason Radio podcast. Chris Honholz, Rich Story, and I chatted about biblical womanhood, women’s ministry, Beth Moore, and more!

Click here to listen in…

…subscribe to the Voice of Reason Radio podcast, and don’t forget to follow VOR on Facebook and Twitter!

Christian women, Complementarianism

The Mother of All Rebellions: Having a Woman Preach on Mother’s Day

May 10, 2019May 1, 2024 Michelle Lesley

When you gaze out across the landscape of the visible church through an earthly, superficial lens, you’ve got to scratch your head and wonder, “Has evangelicalism lost its ever-lovin’ mind?”.

And the answer is to take off those inch-deep dollar store glasses, fire up the electron microscope of Scripture, look long and deep into God’s Word, and reply to yourself, “Of course it has, silly rabbit. What did you expect?”. The Bible is perfectly clear about these things and why they happen.

Exhibit A: The trend in recent years to invite a woman to preach the Sunday morning sermon in church, to the whole congregation (including men) just because it’s Mother’s Day. Not a brief personal testimony, the sermon. This isn’t anything brand new. Lisa Harper has done it at Max Lucado’s church. Christine Caine has done it. Lisa Bevere has done it. Lysa TerKeurst has done it. Priscilla Shirer has done it. And a host of other famous and unfamous women at famous and unfamous churches have been doing it for years, even at churches that normally obey Scripture and don’t let women preach.

This year (2019), Beth Moore has caused quite the stir by hiding in plain sight the fact that she will be ~~preaching the sermon~~ “doing Mother’s Day” this coming Sunday, presumably at the Tomball, Texas, campus of the church she attends (founded and pastored by her son-in-law Curtis Jones¹) Bayou City Fellowship:

I say “hiding in plain sight” because she has given enough of an impression here that she is preaching the sermon to test the waters and see what the reaction will be, but has worded her tweet vaguely enough that if she meets too much resistance she can still decide to back out of preaching, give a brief word of biblically appropriate Mother’s Day greeting or encouragement to the ladies at another point during the service, and come back and claim with wide-eyed innocence that that’s what she meant all along by saying she was “doing” Mother’s Day. (Someone asked Beth point blank, in a subsequent tweet if Beth’s tweet meant that she would be preaching the Sunday service and Beth did not answer her. If she’s not, why not just say so? And if she is and isn’t ashamed of it, why not just say so?)

I say “presumably” at BCF-Tomball because, even though she publicizes specific details about time and place with other speaking engagements, she has not mentioned (at least not anywhere I can find as of the time I’m writing this) the specific church she’s preaching at on Sunday, and the church hasn’t mentioned on their website that she’ll be the guest preacher. Additionally, unlike other speaking engagements Beth does, this speaking engagement is not listed on the calendar of events at her website and she hasn’t mentioned it (other than the tweet above) on social media. With all this “open secrecy” I will be surprised if the video or audio of her sermon is posted on YouTube and/or the church website.

Why all this cloak and dagger about the highest profile woman in the Southern Baptist Convention², possibly in the entirety of evangelicalism, preaching the Mother’s Day sermon?

Because she knows it’s unbiblical. Because we know it’s unbiblical. And it doesn’t take an electron microscope to see it. It’s right there, in black and white, jumping off the pages of Scripture:

I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. 1 Timothy 2:12

It couldn’t be more clear. And for pastors who ought to know better to either fall prey to or intentionally perpetuate the serpentine seduction of “Did God really say you can’t preach?”, using Mother’s Day as an excuse to induce a woman to sin by having her deliver the sermon is a slap in the face – to God, to the church, and to women.

Using Mother’s Day as an excuse to induce a woman to sin by having her deliver the sermon is a slap in the face – to God, to the church, and to women.
Tweet

What do his actions say to God? “I don’t like Your way and I won’t submit to it. I don’t trust that Your way is right regardless of what the world says. I’ll do what’s right in my own eyes.” It’s the lesson his church learns from his actions as well.

But why is inviting a woman to preach an affront to Christian women? Take a stroll down to verse 15 of 1 Timothy 2:

Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.

Not only does the pastor who invites a woman to preach adulterate the role God has set aside specifically for men, he also denigrates one of the good and holy roles God has specifically and intentionally set aside for women: the role of literal, and spiritual, mother.

Eve shattered God’s perfect, unique design for women by allowing herself to be seduced into rebellion. But are we daughters of Eve forever doomed to bear the shame and guilt of her sin, never to have a role in building the Kingdom? Pariahs, to be shunned and shut out of God’s plan? No, praise God! Through the cross, the good works Christ has ordained for Christian women to do – including mothering our own children and being spiritual mothers to our daughters in the faith – redeem the prestige of women. Mothering, in every sense in which God intended it, raises the role of women back to its rightful place in God’s plan.

And we don’t need men – especially men who are supposed to be rightly leading God’s people – to come along and entice us to mess that all up again.

But that’s exactly what’s happening.

When a pastor invites a woman to sin by taking over the pulpit, he drags her and the women of his church right back to post-Fall Eden. He trashes the rank and repute of our God-given high and holy role of mother and implicitly says Being a woman isn’t good enough. You have to steal the role of men to be valued and esteemed.

When a pastor invites a woman to sin by taking over the pulpit, he implicitly says, “Being a woman isn’t good enough. You have to steal the role of men to be valued and esteemed.”
Tweet

Ladies, he’s wrong.

We don’t need to be second rate imitations of men in order to “count”. We need to be first rate, full throttle, take it to the limit women of God. God loves us and values us so much more than to give men a special and amazing role and leave us without an equally special and amazing, yet totally distinct, role. The God who spoke the universe into existence and planned out an unparalleled purpose for every single plant, animal, bacterium, and every other atom of the cosmos, did not leave the queen of His creation roleless. He did not bring us into being only to toddle along after the Hairy Ones trying to copy their every move. How unloving of God, and devaluing to women, would that be? Why would you want to act like a man when God blessed you with the gift of being a woman?

If, by God’s good Providence, you’ve “stumbled across” this article and you’re a woman who has been invited to preach, I plead with you: don’t buy the lie. Say no. Your Savior has a whole treasure chest of good works for you to do as a woman. You are worth infinitely more to Him as the woman He created you to be than you are to the world, or a worldly church, as a cheap knock-off of a man.

The practice of denigrating women, devaluing our God-given role, disobeying God, and darkening the understanding of the church by inviting women to sinfully take the pulpit must stop in the house of God.
Tweet

Let us be the mothers our own children need, raising up a godly seed unto the Lord. Let us be the spiritual mothers longed for by younger women in the faith, daughters orphaned by Christian women who have abandoned them to take on the role of men. The practice of denigrating women, devaluing our God-given role, disobeying God, and darkening the understanding of the church by inviting women to sinfully take the pulpit must stop in the house of God and be replaced by strong godly women, unafraid and unashamed to flourish in the precious role our Lord has blessed us with.

Especially on Mother’s Day.