Mailbag

The Mailbag: Elder crusading for approval of unbiblical missions organization

I want to handle a situation biblically. I am on my churchโ€™s mission committee. We have been asked to support [a parachurch missions organization, henceforth, “PMO”]. Several members of the committee have voiced concerns over the PMO’s position on CRT [Critical Race Theory] and LQBTQ issues. We have provided evidence in the form of video and internal PMO documents. We voted not to support this PMO, but after the meeting, the elder who oversees our committee emailed and said we can only voice issues if we have evidence from the PMO’s public website, and he has scheduled a meeting for us to listen to the PMO’s representatives share their ministry because he believes we are misrepresenting it. I do not want to attend this meeting. I am not even sure if I should continue serving on the committee. He only gave us 24 hours notice of the meeting. How should I respond?

(I have redacted the name of this particular PMO because the reader’s question is about how to handle this situation, not about the PMO itself, and because my answer could apply to any number of demonstrably false teachers or organizations. To name this well known organization would require me to provide and explain the voluminous evidence that this PMO does, indeed, vehemently endorse CRT (watch the video series linked above) and is becoming increasingly unbiblical in their position on perversion. I plan to deal with that in another article about this particular PMO at some point, but dealing with it here would make this article much too long and involved.)

I know thatโ€™s a difficult spot to be in, and, having been in similar situations myself, I certainly sympathize.

If youโ€™re married, and your husband is a Christian, the first thing you should do (which you probably have done, I just like to begin at the beginning :0) is to thoroughly discuss this with your husband and find out what he wants you to do, and do that.

Hebrews 13:17a says, โ€œObey your leaders and submit to them, for they are keeping watch over your souls, as those who will have to give an account.โ€ This elder is not doing his Titus 1:9, 3:10-11 duty to keep watch over the souls of his flock. He is harming them and calling some of them (the discerning committee members) liars. And he will have to give an account of all of that to God. You discerning committee members are actually Godโ€™s grace to him to protect him from this sin and subsequent judgment, and he apparently doesnโ€™t realize or appreciate that.

Heโ€™s got several credible, doctrinally sound committee members coming to him, warning him about a legitimate biblical issue, and heโ€™s basically telling them theyโ€™re wrong in favor of letting the serpents come into the church and further deceive him and the other, less discerning, members of the committee.

The point of this is for the members of the committee to be swayed to support him and the PMO because this is what he wants. Heย wantsย to support the PMO. If theyโ€™re doing the things you and the other concerned committee members say theyโ€™re doing (and they are โ€“ thereโ€™s plenty of reputable evidence out there to prove it, including what you found), does heย reallyย think the representatives are going to admit to it when they visit? Of course not. Theyโ€™re going to speak, softly, gently, and lovingly. Theyโ€™re going to be personable and witty. Theyโ€™re going to give all the right biblical answers. Theyโ€™re going to say whatever they think this elder wants to hear so heโ€™ll side with them and give them the churchโ€™s money.

Something Amy and I have discussed several times on the podcast is this dynamic of sensuality (in the classical sense of the word: โ€œappealing to the sensesโ€ of sight, hearing, etc.). Itโ€™s exactly what Satan did in the Garden to convince Eve to eat the fruit (see the section on Genesis 3, here). He smooth talked her and appealed to her senses โ€“ her feelings โ€“ which she followed over her reason: that which she already knew with her brain that God had commanded. (Sensuality is why, for example, itโ€™s easier to be objective about whether or not the lyrics of a worship song are biblical when you read the lyrics from a piece of paper rather than listening to the song. The music appeals to your sense of hearing and your emotions, which can override your rational, objective reasoning.)

Thatโ€™s why โ€“ whether he realizes it or not โ€“ your elder is bringing these people in to meet with you in person. Itโ€™s a lot easier to appeal to peopleโ€™s senses and feelings face to face and with your sincere tone of voice and sparkling personality than it is to sway them with facts on a piece of paper.

I really hate to say these things about your elder, but either heโ€™s being underhanded, or heโ€™s well intentioned, yet incredibly gullible and undiscerning. (In fact, he may be allowing his feelings of sentimentality for this PMO to sway him even though he can clearly see the evidence that their beliefs and practices contradict Scripture.)

Either way, assuming this is his general state instead of this being a one time slip up, both of these things are disqualifying (see the qualifications for elders in 1 Timothy 3:1-7 and Titus 1:5-9). One of the requirements for elders in the Titus 1 passage is in verse 9:

He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it.

Heโ€™s not โ€œrebuking those who contradictโ€ sound doctrine (the PMO), heโ€™s being a corrupt gatekeeper and welcoming the wolves into his sheepfold. If he doesnโ€™t repent, especially if this is a pattern for him, he has disqualified himself from eldership.

An additional issue is โ€“ what in the world is going on here with your church’s polity? Your committee voted not to fund this PMO and this elder singlehandedly overrules the committee? Why does the committee even exist? Is it just supposed to be a rubber stamp for whatever any particular elder wants? That’s not biblical.

Furthermore, why is he so locked in on this particular PMO? There are dozens of doctrinally sound missions organizations out there that your church could support and that your committee and your elder could probably unanimously agree on. Why does it have to be this PMO? (My guess: He worked for them in the past or has some sort of personal connection to them, ergo, the sentimentality, or there’s somebody he knows who works for this PMO that he wants to support using the church’s finances. This could be a conflict of interest.)

What I would do is to go to the meeting with my phone in hand, voice memo app open, and let it be known that youโ€™re going to be recording the meeting so you can listen to it again later to make sure you havenโ€™t misunderstood or missed anything. Do not try to hide the fact that youโ€™re recording it. That makes you look sneaky and deceptive, plus, you have nothing to hide. You’re not doing anything wrong. This is just an electronic form of taking notes. Additionally, if youโ€™re told, by the elder or the PMO representatives, that you canโ€™t record the meeting, that speaks volumes about their motives.

After the meeting, the discerning members of the committee should go back to the elder and talk to him again. (You might want to really emphasize my point above that if the PMO were guilty of doing these things, they wouldnโ€™t admit it.). If he digs his heels in and your church hierarchy has another elder or head pastor above him in the chain of command, make an appointment with him, take your whole group, and express your concerns to him. Go as far up the chain of command as you can until you get to the top or until somebody listens and deals with this elder.

If the elder is at the top of the chain of command, and supporting false teachers/doctrine is typical of the way he operates, and he doesnโ€™t repent, you need to find out what your churchโ€™s protocol is for initiating church discipline with an elder and the discerning male members of the committee, your husband, and/or other appropriate men should initiate it. If there is no protocol and he canโ€™t be removed and doesnโ€™t repent, Iโ€™d go ahead and find a new church. But until you do (or if you decide to stay at this church despite this issue), explore your church’s options for designating your offerings so your money doesn’t go to support this PMO.

Readers, if you’re going through any sort of similar situation at your church, you may wish to explore my article The Mailbag: How should I approach my church leaders about a false teacher theyโ€™re introducing?


If you have a question about: a Bible passage, an aspect of theology, a current issue in Christianity, or how to biblically handle a family, life, or church situation, comment below (Iโ€™ll hold all questions in queue {unpublished} for a future edition of The Mailbag) or send me an e-mail. If your question is chosen for publication, your anonymity will be protected.


Discover more from Michelle Lesley

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “The Mailbag: Elder crusading for approval of unbiblical missions organization”

  1. Wow, I have a friend going through the same thing. She and her husband brought to the elders all the website material etc. from the PMO. Elders finally decided not to have the PMO person come teach their flock. But it was to keep unity with my friend and her husband, not because they saw the doctrinal error and CRT. The issue with lots of PMO’s is that they really have no biblical basis to exist. So there are good folks and bad folks in them and good folks that are too weak or dependent on making their living by donations. And again, those donations to PMO’s take money/donations from the church and other biblical ministries. Same goes for IMB too, people have no idea what gospel is being taught. Churches should pick a missionary they trust and know they teach the truth and personally support them and not give to huge groups where you have no idea where or to whom your hard earned dollars go.

    Like

    1. To edit….they did see doctrinal error with CRT but didn’t see doctrinal error with supporting someone who works for the PMO with the doctrinal error.

      Like

Before commenting please see the "Welcome" tab in the blue menu bar at the top of this page. Comments are handled manually, so there will be a delay before approved comments are posted. I do not publish comments which promote false doctrine.